Systematic Study about the Audit of Medical Device

Souvik Kundu (1) , Debraj Paul (2) , Rahul Patra (3) , Jaydip Ray (4)
(1) Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, Guru Nanak Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, West Bengal, Kolkata-700114, India, India ,
(2) Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, Guru Nanak Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, West Bengal, Kolkata-700114, India, India ,
(3) Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, Guru Nanak Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, West Bengal, Kolkata-700114, India, India ,
(4) Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, Guru Nanak Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, West Bengal, Kolkata-700114, India, India

Abstract

In the field of Medical science and technology, the medical device section is one of the crucial parts and has tremendous effects on the healthcare sector. The medical device to save lives has a game-changing invention in the healthcare sector. That’s why efficacy and safety is a primary concern related to the use of medical devices. It is the primary expectation that the patients will experience the enhancement of treatment quality after using these gadgets. For this reason, regulatory acceptance is much needed, and each medical device manufacturer has to go through an auditing process. The quality process audit is beneficial to multiple stakeholders and it also assures the quality process methods and related standards as well as the outcome products. It also minimizes the adverse effects related to the use in the treatment process. In comparison between government and private auditing bodies, the government sector proves more costly in the purpose of conducting an audit. The auditing bodies are responsible to ensure product quality and meet up all regulatory compliance and standards. The approved regulatory bodies also have quality training expert members and having up to date rules and regulations backed up. In this article, various types and methods of auditing are mentioned which covers every part of the auditing requirements.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Devanshi Brahmbhatt. Devang Tande Regulatory Auditing of Medical Devices. International Journal Of Innovative Research In Technology, 2022:247–254.

ISO 9000. Quality management systems - Fundamentals and vocabulary, 2015.

P Shailaja, Dinesh, Mani, Snehalatha, and K Ashok. A Review on Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) It’s Pros, Cons and Challenges. 2022.

Nerea Arandia, Jose Garate, and Jon Mabe. Medical Devices with Embedded Sensor Systems: Design and Development Methodology for Start-Ups. Sensors, 23:2578, 2023.

G J Anderson. Shaping the Future: Using Voice of the Customer Methodology to Develop Inhaler Design. Resp. Drug Del, 8:1–10, 2002.

K Garmer, E Liljegren, A L Osvalder, and S Dahlman. Arguing for the need of triangulation and iteration when designing medical equipment. J Clin Monit Comput, 17(2):105– 119, 2002.

J P Lane, D J Usiak, V I Stone, and M J Scherer. The voice of the customer: consumers define the ideal battery charger. Assist Technol, 9(2):130–139, 1997.

J L Martin, B J Norris, E Murphy, and J A Crowe. Medical device development: the challenge for ergonomics. Appl Ergon, 39(3):271–83, 2007.

P J Clarkson, R Coleman, R Lane, D Stubbs, J Ward, J Jarrett, and J Bound. Design for Patient Safety: a System-wide Design-led Approach to Tackling Patient Safety in the NHS. Department of Health Publications. London, 2003.

P Buckle, P J Clarkson, R Coleman, J Ward, and J Anderson. Patient safety, systems design and ergonomics. Appl Ergon, 37(4):491–500, 2006.

De Angeli, Antonella Athavankar, Uday, Joshi, Anirudha, Lynne Coventry, and Graham Johnson. Introducing ATMs in India: A contextual inquiry. Interacting with Computers, 2004.

Jennifer Martin, Elizabeth Murphy, John Crowe, and Beverley Norris. Capturing User Requirements in Medical Device Development: The Role of Ergonomics. Physiological measurement, 27, 2006.

K Garmer, J Ylven, and I C M Karlsson. User participation in requirements elicitation comparing focus group interviews and usability tests for eliciting usability requirements for medical equipment: A case study. Int. J. Ind. Ergon, 33:85–98, 2004.

IEC 60601-1-6. General Requirements for Safety of Electrical Medical Equipment Collateral Standard: Usability, 2004.

IEC 60601-1-8. Collateral Standard: General requirements, tests and guidance for alarm systems in medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems. pages 60601–60602, 2004.

General Requirements for Safety of Electrical Medical Equipment. IEC, pages 60601–60602, 2004.

GHTF/SG4/N28. Guidelines for Regulatory Auditing of Quality Management Systems of Medical Device Manufacturers, 2018.

Gmp-compliance. Guidelines for Regulatory Auditing of Quality Management Systems of Medical Device Manufacturers - Part 2: Regulatory Auditing Strategy, 2006.

Marius and C Popa Toma. Stages for Development of the Audit Processes of the Distributed Informatics Systems. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 4:359–371, 2009.

ISO 10011-1. Guidelines for auditing quality systems - Part 1: Auditing, 1990.

ISO 10011-2. Guidelines for auditing quality systems - Part 2: Qualification criteria for quality system auditors, 1991.

ISO 10011-3. Guidelines for auditing quality systems - Part 3: Management of audit programmers, 1991.

AUDIT PROCESS. The University of Texas at Austin, 2023.

GHTF/SG4/N28. Guidelines for Regulatory Auditing of Quality Systems of Medical Device Manufacturers -Part 1: General Requirements, 2022.

GHTF SG 1 N 29 R 16. Information Document Concerning the Definition of the Term “Medical Device. 16, 2005.

ISO 8402. Quality management and quality assurance – Vocabulary, 1994.

ISO 1411. Guidelines for environmental auditing - Audit procedures - Auditing of environ- mental management systems, 1996.

GHTF/SG4/N28. Guidelines for Regulatory Auditing of Quality Systems of Medical Device Manufacturers - Part 1: General Requirements, 2022.

ISO/IEC Guide 62. General requirements for bodies operating assessment and certification/registration of quality systems, 1996.

Quality management systems -Fundamentals and vocabulary IAF Guidance on Application of ISO/IEC Guide 62. ISO, 9000:15–15, 2000.

ISO 19011. Guidelines for quality and/or environmental management systems auditing, 2002.

ISO 13485. Medical devices-Quality management systems - Requirements for regulatory purposes, 2003.

ISO/TR 14969. Medical devices - Quality management systems-Guidance on the application of ISO 13485, 2003.

Alla Kotvitska, Lebedynets, and Tetiana Viacheslav Karamavrova. The PDCA cycle implementation at the internal audit process of quality management systems of pharmaceutical companies. 2019.

Júlio Barros, Paulo Cortez, and M Sameiro Carvalho. A systematic literature review about dimensioning safety stock under uncertainties and risks in the procurement process. Operations Research Perspectives, 8, 2021.

TGA. Auditing of medical devices, including IVD medical devices, 2022.

GHTF-SG3/N15 R8. Implementation of Risk Management Principles and Activities within a Quality Management System, 2005.

ISO 13485. Audit: Overview, Audit Types and Execution Version 1.3, 2016.

FDA. Guide to Inspections of Quality Systems (QSIT); US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 2022.

Medical devices - application of risk management to medical devices. ISO, 14971, 2000.

Academia.edu. Guidelines for quality and/or environmental management systems auditing, 2002.

Authors

Souvik Kundu
Debraj Paul
Rahul Patra
Jaydip Ray
jaydip.ray@gnipst.ac.in (Primary Contact)
Souvik Kundu, Debraj Paul, Rahul Patra, & Jaydip Ray. (2023). Systematic Study about the Audit of Medical Device. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, 14(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v14i2.4278

Article Details

No Related Submission Found