Preference of technique for measurement of width of attached gingiva in abutment teeth for fixed dental prosthesis - A retrospective study

Neppala Gowtham (1) , Nabeel Ahmed (2)
(1) Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai-600077, Tamil Nadu, India, India ,
(2) Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai-600077, Tamil Nadu, India, India

Abstract

Attached gingiva is the distance between the mucogingival junction to a projection of the external surface of the sulcus or the periodontal pocket. There are mainly 3 methods for evaluating attached gingiva functional method (roll technique), the visual method with or without histochemical staining, anesthesia method. This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to identify the most commonly used technique for measuring the width of attached gingiva among patients. The study group consists of Adult patients who attended the outpatient Department of Prosthodontics from June 2019-March 2020. 86,000 case sheets were reviewed and sampling was done using simple random sampling. A chi-square test was done to evaluate the correlation between age, gender and Profession with Technique for measurement of Attached gingiva. From the study, we can see that most of the students used Roll technique to find Attached gingiva and some used Balloon technique to find attached gingiva. However, there is no significant correlation between age, gender and Profession with Technique of width of attached gingiva.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

Authors

Neppala Gowtham
151909001.sdc@saveetha.com (Primary Contact)
Nabeel Ahmed
Neppala Gowtham, & Nabeel Ahmed. (2020). Preference of technique for measurement of width of attached gingiva in abutment teeth for fixed dental prosthesis - A retrospective study. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, 11((SPL 3), 861–865. Retrieved from https://ijrps.com/home/article/view/2729

Article Details

No Related Submission Found