Comparative study of healing of Diabetic foot ulcers between conventional method and local application of probiotics

Unnikrishnan E S (1) , Balaji D (2) , Velineni Bharath (3) , Arul A (4)
(1) Department of General Surgery, SRM Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu – 603203, India, India ,
(2) Department of General Surgery, SRM Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu – 603203, India, India ,
(3) Department of General Surgery, SRM Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu – 603203, India, India ,
(4) Department of General Surgery, SRM Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu – 603203, India, India

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is one of the most critical health issues in the health care system. Patients with Diabetes are subject to various complications. Diabetic foot infection is one of most incapacitating kinds of human infection. Due to growing antimicrobial and antibiotic resistance, existing medications have undesirable side effects and inadequate healing mechanisms. Probiotics are either a single organism or combination of organisms capable of boosting the body’s immune system, promoting anti-inflammatory action, and enhancing the wound healing process at the site of an infection. Therefore, it is a revolutionary strategy to use probiotics to eradicate harmful microorganisms and enhance wound healing. Hence the present study was performed to compare the conventional method and local application of probiotics to treat Diabetic foot ulcer. In present study average age of patients in both group were found almost similar 58.58 years in control group and 57.3 years in probiotic group. The diabetic foot wound size of all patients in both groups were evaluated and it was found that mean wound size in both group were almost same. During the study it was found that there was no significant difference in mean wound bed score between two groups on day 1(Control:8.12; Probiotic: 8.24), whereas a significant difference observed on day 7(Control: 10.36; Probiotic; 11.14) and day 14 (Control:12.78; Probiotic:13.56). An increase was seen in mean wound bed score in both groups from day 1 to day 14 but it was observed more in Probiotic group. Present study concludes that probiotics can be safely utilized in therapy of infected diabetic wounds. The probiotic when used along with conventional therapy could results in the hastening the wound healing process as evidenced by significant difference in the day 7 and 14 wound bed scores. Although more studies are needed in this field to give better evidence for support of probiotic use.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

T A Oelschlaeger. Mechanisms of probiotic actions - A review. International Journal of Medical Microbiology, 300(1):57–62, 2010.

F L Game, R J Hinchliffe, J Apelqvist, D G Armstrong, K Bakker, A Hartemann, M Löndahl, P E Price, and W J Jeffcoate. A systematic review of interventions to enhance the healing of chronic ulcers of the foot in diabetes. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 28:119–141, 2012.

M C Peral, M A Huaman Martinez, and J C Valdez. Bacteriotherapy with Lactobacillus plantarum in burns. International Wound Journal, 6(1):73–81, 2009.

S Fijan, A Frauwallner, T Langerholc, B Krebs, J A Ter Haar, A Heschl, D Mičetić Turk, and I Rogelj. Efficacy of Using Probiotics with Antagonistic Activity against Pathogens of Wound Infections: An Integrative Review of Literature. BioMed Research International, pages 1–21, 2019.

S Mohseni, M Bayani, and F Bahmani. The effects of probiotic administration on wound healing and metabolic status in patients with diabetic foot ulcer: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 34(3):207–222, 2018.

S S Patil, S A Katii, K A More, and S Mahajan. Topical Application of Probiotics and Novel Approach For Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer. Int J Recent Sci Res, 13(4):1038– 1081, 2022.

M Sonal Sekhar, M K Unnikrishnan, K Vijayanarayana, G S Rodrigues, and C Mukhopadhyay. Topical application/formulation of probiotics: Will it be a novel treatment approach for diabetic foot ulcers? Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses, 82(1):86–88, 2014.

L Yazdanpanah. Literature review on the management of diabetic foot ulcer. World Journal of Diabetes, 6(1), 2015.

D R Whiting, L Guariguata, C Weil, and J Shaw. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 94(3):311–321, 2011.

M Aalaa, O T Malazy, M Sanjari, M Peimani, and M Mohajeri-Tehrani. Nurses’ role in diabetic foot prevention and care; a review. Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, 11(1):24–28, 2012.

C Vuotto, F Longo, and G Donelli. Probiotics to counteract biofilm-associated infections: promising and conflicting data. International Journal of Oral Science, 6(4):189–194, 2014.

R G Frykberg, V R Driver, D Carman, B Lucero, C Borris-Hale, C P Fylling, L M Rappl, and P A Clausen. Chronic wounds treated with a physiologically relevant concentration of platelet-rich plasma gel: a prospective case series. Ostomy/Wound Management, 56(6):36–44, 2010.

N Subramani and C Madhavan. Probiotics in Diabetic Wound Care. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences, 16(7):65–71, 2017.

Authors

Unnikrishnan E S
Balaji D
trace.balaji@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Velineni Bharath
Arul A
Unnikrishnan E S, Balaji D, Velineni Bharath, & Arul A. (2022). Comparative study of healing of Diabetic foot ulcers between conventional method and local application of probiotics. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, 13(3), 330–338. https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v13i3.2501

Article Details

No Related Submission Found