Association of socioeconomic disparity of the pregnant women with adverse pregnancy outcomes

Vineela Nekkanti (1) , Githa Kishore (2)
(1) Department of Pharmacy Practice, Visveswarapura Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, India ,
(2) Department of Pharmacy Practice, Visveswarapura Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, India

Abstract

Socioeconomic status of the pregnant women is a key determinant of the pregnancy outcomes. The government of India has started several health schemes to provide appropriate antenatal care for the pregnant women. The present study aimed to assess the association of socioeconomic status of pregnant women with adverse pregnancy outcomes after the implementation of these schemes. The present study used Kuppuswamy scale to determine the socio-economic status of the study subjects and pregnant women of both upper and lower SES class without major pregnancy complications were recruited into the study. These subjects were followed up until delivery, and their adverse pregnancy outcomes such as lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) delivery, preterm birth, low birth weight (LBW) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission were reported. In the present study, the rate of LSCS, preterm birth, LBW and NICU admission was high among the lower SES group as compared to the upper SES group women. However, NICU admission had a statistically significant association with SES of pregnant women at p=0.038. The difference in the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes among the upper and lower SES pregnant women is minimal, which could be attributed to the enrolment of lower SES pregnant women to the government health schemes. Hence, to overcome the economic disparities among the pregnant women, the implementation of government health schemes should be strengthened by promoting the role of the accredited social health activist (ASHA) worker.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Aaron 2019. DK: Thayi card given to 74924 people in three years. [Accessed On 11 October 2019]. Udayavani.

Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) 2021. Vikaspedia. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India. [Accessed 30 March 2021]. National Health Mission.

Aftab, S., Ara, J., Kazi, S., Deeba, F. 2012. Effects of poverty on pregnant women. Pakistan Journal of Medical Research, 51(1).

Andriyanov, N.A., Vasil, K.K., Dement, V.E. 2019. Investigation of filtering and objects detection algorithms for a multizone image sequence. ISPRS-International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-2/W12:7–10.

Choudhary, A.K., Choudhary, A., Tiwari, S.C., Dwivedi, R. 2013. Factors associated with low birth weight among newborns in an urban slum community in Bhopal. Indian Journal of Public Health, 57(1):20–20.

Government of India 2021. Pradhan Mantri Surakshit Matritva Abhiyan. National health portal. [Accessed On Mar 15, 2021]. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MoHFW).

Government of India 2014. Annual Report 2013-14. [online] Department of Health & Family Welfare. [Accessed: 10 Jan 2021]. Viba Press Pvt Ltd, pages 1–382.

Government of Karnataka 2016. Thayi bhagya scheme. Center for e-Governance. National Health Mission. [Updated on 20/07/2016]. Health & Family welfare services.

Government of Karnataka 2017. Yeshasvini co-operative farmers health care scheme. Department of Coperation. [Accessed On 30/09/2017]. Sahakara Sindhu.

Gupta, S.K. 2012. Impact of Janani Suraksha Yojana on institutional delivery rate and maternal morbidity and mortality: an observational study in India. Journal of health, 30:464–71.

Health Connect Fellowship 2020. 5 Barriers Pregnant Women in Poverty Face to Getting the Care They Need. [Accessed: 09 Jan 2021]. Mid-Iowa Health Foundation, pages 9–9.

ICDS 2009. Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) Scheme. [Accessed 9 January 2021]. Ministry of Women and Child Development.

Kim, M.K., Lee, S.M., Bae, S.H., Kim, H.J., Lim, N.G., Yoon, S.J., Jo, M.W. 2018. Socioeconomic status can affect pregnancy outcomes and complications, even with a universal healthcare system. International journal for equity in health, 17(1):1–8.

Mascarenhas, A. 2019. Babies with low birth weight: trends in the world, India. [Last accessed 10 January 2021]. The Indian Express, Pune, pages 10– 10.

Patro, B.K., Jeyashree, K., Gupta, P.K. 2012. Kuppuswamy’s Socioeconomic Status Scale 2010— The Need for Periodic Revision. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 79(3):395–396.

Pregnant Women Schemes 2019. Government Schemes for Pregnant Women and Children in India. [Accessed On 15 March 2021]. WOW Parenting.

Shieh, C., Halstead, J.A. 2009. Understanding the Impact of Health Literacy on Women’s Health. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 38(5):601–612.

UNICEF 2019. Maternal health. [Online]. [Accessed 10 January 2021]. UNICEF for every child.

UNICEF 2019. World Not Delivering Quality Maternal Health Care to Poorest Mothers. Press Release. [Accessed: 03 Jun 2019]. New York/ Vancouver.

Authors

Vineela Nekkanti
vineelanekenti@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Githa Kishore
Vineela Nekkanti, & Githa Kishore. (2021). Association of socioeconomic disparity of the pregnant women with adverse pregnancy outcomes. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, 12(2), 1667–1671. Retrieved from https://ijrps.com/home/article/view/344

Article Details

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

No Related Submission Found