\documentclass[twocolumn,twoside]{article}
\makeatletter\if@twocolumn\PassOptionsToPackage{switch}{lineno}\else\fi\makeatother

\usepackage{amsfonts,amssymb,amsbsy,latexsym,amsmath,tabulary,graphicx,times,xcolor}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Following additional macros are required to function some 
% functions which are not available in the class used.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\usepackage{url,multirow,morefloats,floatflt,cancel,tfrupee}
\makeatletter


\AtBeginDocument{\@ifpackageloaded{textcomp}{}{\usepackage{textcomp}}}
\makeatother
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage{pifont}
\usepackage[nointegrals]{wasysym}
\urlstyle{rm}
\makeatletter

%%%For Table column width calculation.
\def\mcWidth#1{\csname TY@F#1\endcsname+\tabcolsep}

%%Hacking center and right align for table
\def\cAlignHack{\rightskip\@flushglue\leftskip\@flushglue\parindent\z@\parfillskip\z@skip}
\def\rAlignHack{\rightskip\z@skip\leftskip\@flushglue \parindent\z@\parfillskip\z@skip}

%Etal definition in references
\@ifundefined{etal}{\def\etal{\textit{et~al}}}{}


%\if@twocolumn\usepackage{dblfloatfix}\fi
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex\else\if@twocolumn\@ifpackageloaded{stfloats}{}{\usepackage{dblfloatfix}}\fi\fi

\AtBeginDocument{
\expandafter\ifx\csname eqalign\endcsname\relax
\def\eqalign#1{\null\vcenter{\def\\{\cr}\openup\jot\m@th
  \ialign{\strut$\displaystyle{##}$\hfil&$\displaystyle{{}##}$\hfil
      \crcr#1\crcr}}\,}
\fi
}

%For fixing hardfail when unicode letters appear inside table with endfloat
\AtBeginDocument{%
  \@ifpackageloaded{endfloat}%
   {\renewcommand\efloat@iwrite[1]{\immediate\expandafter\protected@write\csname efloat@post#1\endcsname{}}}{\newif\ifefloat@tables}%
}%

\def\BreakURLText#1{\@tfor\brk@tempa:=#1\do{\brk@tempa\hskip0pt}}
\let\lt=<
\let\gt=>
\def\processVert{\ifmmode|\else\textbar\fi}
\let\processvert\processVert

\@ifundefined{subparagraph}{
\def\subparagraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{5}{2\parindent}{0ex plus 0.1ex minus 0.1ex}%
{0ex}{\normalfont\small\itshape}}%
}{}

% These are now gobbled, so won't appear in the PDF.
\newcommand\role[1]{\unskip}
\newcommand\aucollab[1]{\unskip}
  
\@ifundefined{tsGraphicsScaleX}{\gdef\tsGraphicsScaleX{1}}{}
\@ifundefined{tsGraphicsScaleY}{\gdef\tsGraphicsScaleY{.9}}{}
% To automatically resize figures to fit inside the text area
\def\checkGraphicsWidth{\ifdim\Gin@nat@width>\linewidth
	\tsGraphicsScaleX\linewidth\else\Gin@nat@width\fi}

\def\checkGraphicsHeight{\ifdim\Gin@nat@height>.9\textheight
	\tsGraphicsScaleY\textheight\else\Gin@nat@height\fi}

\def\fixFloatSize#1{}%\@ifundefined{processdelayedfloats}{\setbox0=\hbox{\includegraphics{#1}}\ifnum\wd0<\columnwidth\relax\renewenvironment{figure*}{\begin{figure}}{\end{figure}}\fi}{}}
\let\ts@includegraphics\includegraphics

\def\inlinegraphic[#1]#2{{\edef\@tempa{#1}\edef\baseline@shift{\ifx\@tempa\@empty0\else#1\fi}\edef\tempZ{\the\numexpr(\numexpr(\baseline@shift*\f@size/100))}\protect\raisebox{\tempZ pt}{\ts@includegraphics{#2}}}}

%\renewcommand{\includegraphics}[1]{\ts@includegraphics[width=\checkGraphicsWidth]{#1}}
\AtBeginDocument{\def\includegraphics{\@ifnextchar[{\ts@includegraphics}{\ts@includegraphics[width=\checkGraphicsWidth,height=\checkGraphicsHeight,keepaspectratio]}}}

\DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathpzc}{OT1}{pzc}{m}{it}

\def\URL#1#2{\@ifundefined{href}{#2}{\href{#1}{#2}}}

%%For url break
\def\UrlOrds{\do\*\do\-\do\~\do\'\do\"\do\-}%
\g@addto@macro{\UrlBreaks}{\UrlOrds}



\edef\fntEncoding{\f@encoding}
\def\EUoneEnc{EU1}
\makeatother
\def\floatpagefraction{0.8} 
\def\dblfloatpagefraction{0.8}
\def\style#1#2{#2}
\def\xxxguillemotleft{\fontencoding{T1}\selectfont\guillemotleft}
\def\xxxguillemotright{\fontencoding{T1}\selectfont\guillemotright}

\newif\ifmultipleabstract\multipleabstractfalse%
\newenvironment{typesetAbstractGroup}{}{}%

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

\usepackage[authoryear]{natbib}



\newif\ifnokeywords\nokeywordsfalse

\makeatletter\input{size10-pointfive.clo}\makeatother%
\definecolor{kwdboxcolor}{RGB}{242,242,242}
\usepackage[hidelinks,colorlinks=true,allcolors=blue]{hyperref}
\linespread{1}                 
\def\floatpagefraction{0.8}

\usepackage[paperheight=11.69in,paperwidth=8.26in,top=1in,bottom=1in,left=1in,right=.75in,headsep=24pt]{geometry}

\usepackage{multirow-custom}

\makeatletter

\def\hlinewd#1{%
  \noalign{\ifnum0=`}\fi\hrule \@height #1%
  \futurelet\reserved@a\@xhline}
\def\tbltoprule{\hlinewd{1pt}\\[-14pt]}
\def\tblbottomrule{\noalign{\vspace*{6pt}}\hline\noalign{\vspace*{2pt}}}
\def\tblmidrule{\hline\noalign{\vspace*{2pt}}}



\let\@articleType\@empty
\let\@journalDoi\@empty
\let\@journalVolume\@empty
\let\@journalIssue\@empty
\let\@crossMarkLink\@empty
\let\@receivedDate\@empty
\let\@acceptedDate\@empty
\let\@revisedDate\@empty
\let\@publishedDate\@empty
\let\@copyrightYear\@empty
\let\@firstPage\@empty
\def\articleType#1{\gdef\@articleType{#1}}
\def\journalDoi#1{\gdef\@journalDoi{#1}}
\def\crossMarkLink#1{\gdef\@crossMarkLink{#1}}
\def\receivedDate#1{\gdef\@receivedDate{#1}}
\def\acceptedDate#1{\gdef\@acceptedDate{#1}}
\def\revisedDate#1{\gdef\@revisedDate{#1}}
\def\publishedDate#1{\gdef\@publishedDate{#1}}
\def\copyrightYear#1{\gdef\@copyrightYear{#1}}
\def\journalVolume#1{\gdef\@journalVolume{#1}}
\def\journalIssue#1{\gdef\@journalIssue{#1}}
\def\firstPage#1{\gdef\@firstPage{#1}}
\let\@issuelogo\@empty%
\let\@issuelogoex\@empty%
\def\issuelogo#1{\gdef\@issuelogo{#1}}
\def\issuelogoex#1{\gdef\@issuelogoex{#1}}


\def\author#1{%
  \gdef\@author{%
    \hskip-\dimexpr(\tabcolsep)\hskip5pt%
    \parbox{\dimexpr\textwidth-1pt}%
    {\fontsize{11}{13}\selectfont\raggedright #1}%
  }%
}


\usepackage{pharmascope-abs}
\usepackage{caption}
\usepackage{lastpage}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage[noindentafter,explicit]{titlesec}
\usepackage{fontspec}

\setmainfont[%
BoldFont=cambriab.ttf,%
ItalicFont=CAMBRIAI.TTF,%
BoldItalicFont=CAMBRIAZ.TTF]{Cambria.ttf}
\lefthyphenmin = 3

\def\title#1{%
  \gdef\@title{%
      \vspace*{-40pt}%
       \ifx\@articleType\@empty\else{\fontsize{10}{12}\scshape\selectfont\hspace{8pt}\@articleType\hfill\mbox{}\par\vspace{2pt}}\fi%
       \minipage{\linewidth}
         \hrulefill\\[-0.7pt]%%{\includegraphics[width=75pt,height=50pt]{ijrps_logo.png}}\hfill
         \mbox{~}\hspace{5pt}\parbox{.1\linewidth}{\IfFileExists{images/\@issuelogo.\@issuelogoex}{\includegraphics[width=79pt,height=61pt]{images/\@issuelogo.\@issuelogoex}}{\includegraphics[width=75pt,height=50pt]{ijrps_logo.png}}}\hfill
         \fcolorbox{kwdboxcolor}{kwdboxcolor}{\parbox{.792\linewidth}{%
          \begin{center}\fontsize{17}{17}\selectfont\scshape\vskip-7pt International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences\hfill\end{center}%
          \vspace*{-10pt}\hspace*{4pt}{\fontsize{8}{9}\selectfont Published by JK Welfare \& Pharmascope Foundation\hfill  Journal Home Page: \href{https://ijrps.com}{\color{blue}\underline{\smash{https://ijrps.com}}}}\hspace*{4pt}\mbox{}}}%
       \par\vspace*{-1pt}\rule{\linewidth}{1.3pt}%
       \endminipage%
    \par\vspace*{9.2pt}\parbox{.98\linewidth}{\linespread{.9}\raggedright\fontsize{14}{17}\selectfont #1}%
    \vspace*{-8pt}%
  }
}


\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}
\setlength{\parskip}{0.4pc plus 1pt minus 1pt}

\def\abbrvJournalTitle{Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci.}

\fancypagestyle{headings}{%
  \renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}%
  \renewcommand{\footrulewidth}{0.3pt}
  \fancyhf{}%
  \fancyhead[R]{%
    \fontsize{9.12}{11}\selectfont\RunningAuthor,\ \abbrvJournalTitle,\ \ifx\@journalVolume\@empty X\else\@journalVolume\fi%
    \ifx\@journalIssue\@empty\else(\@journalIssue)\fi%
    ,\ \ifx\@firstPage\@empty 1\else\@firstPage\fi-\pageref*{LastPage}%
  }%
  \fancyfoot[LO,RE]{\fontsize{9.12}{11}\selectfont\textcopyright\ International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences}%
  \fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\fontsize{9.12}{11}\selectfont\thepage}
}\pagestyle{headings}

                                                         
\fancypagestyle{plain}{%
  \renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}%
  \renewcommand{\footrulewidth}{0.3pt}%
  \fancyhf{}%
  \fancyhead[R]{%
    \fontsize{9.12}{11}\selectfont\RunningAuthor,\ \abbrvJournalTitle,\ \ifx\@journalVolume\@empty X\else\@journalVolume\fi%
    \ifx\@journalIssue\@empty\else(\@journalIssue)\fi%
    ,\ \ifx\@firstPage\@empty 1\else\@firstPage\fi-\pageref*{LastPage}%
  }%
  \fancyfoot[LO,RE]{\fontsize{9.12}{11}\selectfont\textcopyright\ International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences}%
  \fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\fontsize{9.12}{11}\selectfont\thepage}
  \ifx\@firstPage\@empty\else\setcounter{page}{\@firstPage}\fi
}


\def\NormalBaseline{\def\baselinestretch{1.1}}
\usepackage{textcase}
\setcounter{secnumdepth}{0}

\titleformat{\section}[block]{\bfseries\boldmath\NormalBaseline\filright\fontsize{10.5}{13}\selectfont}
{\thesection}
{6pt}
{\MakeTextUppercase{#1}}
[]
\titleformat{\subsection}[block]{\bfseries\boldmath\NormalBaseline\filright\fontsize{10.5}{12}\selectfont}
{\thesubsection}
{6pt}
{#1}
[]
\titleformat{\subsubsection}[block]{\NormalBaseline\filright\fontsize{10.5}{12}\selectfont}
{\thesubsubsection}
{6pt}
{#1}
[]
\titleformat{\paragraph}[block]{\NormalBaseline\filright\fontsize{10.5}{10}\selectfont}
{\theparagraph}
{6pt}
{#1}
[]
\titleformat{\subparagraph}[block]{\NormalBaseline\filright\fontsize{10.5}{12}\selectfont}
{\thesubparagraph}
{6pt}
{#1}
[]

\titlespacing{\section}{0pt}{.5\baselineskip}{.5\baselineskip}  
\titlespacing{\subsection}{0pt}{.5\baselineskip}{.5\baselineskip}  
\titlespacing{\subsubsection}{0pt}{.5\baselineskip}{.5\baselineskip}  
\titlespacing{\paragraph}{0pt}{.5\baselineskip}{.5\baselineskip}  
\titlespacing{\subparagraph}{0pt}{.5\baselineskip}{.5\baselineskip}

\captionsetup[figure]{skip=1.4pt,font=bf,labelsep=colon,justification=raggedright,singlelinecheck=false}
\captionsetup[table]{skip=1.4pt,font=bf,labelsep=colon,justification=raggedright,singlelinecheck=false}

\def\bibyear#1{#1}
%\def\bibjtitle#1{#1}   %%Publisher request
\def\bibauand{}
\setlength\bibsep{3pt}
\setlength\bibhang{8pt}

\makeatother
\date{}


\usepackage[flushleft]{threeparttablex}

\usepackage{float}

\begin{document}


\def\RunningAuthor{Jamie Foong Siew Wei et al.}
\firstPage{2973}
\articleType{Original Article}
\receivedDate{17.05.2019}
\acceptedDate{18.08.2019}
\revisedDate{14.08.2019}
\journalVolume{10}
\journalIssue{4}
\journalDoi{ijrps.v10i4.1581}
\copyrightYear{2019}
\def\authorCount{3}
\def\affCount{2}

\def\journalTitle{International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences}

\title{Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess knowledge, attitude and confidence regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation among ambulance drivers in Malaysia}
\author{Jamie~Foong~Siew~Wei\textsuperscript{*}\textsuperscript{1},  
            Mohd~Azmani~bin~Sahar\textsuperscript{2}, 
            Ahmad~Zulkarnain~Ahmad~Zahedi\textsuperscript{1}~\\[5pt]{\textsuperscript{1}Department of Emergency Medicine\unskip, University Malaya Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia}~\\{\textsuperscript{2}Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences\unskip, Universiti Sains Islam, Malaysia}}

\begin{abstract}
Out of hospital cardiac arrest is a major cause of death worldwide. The outcome from out of hospital cardiac arrest remains poor, thus requiring immediate emergency medical intervention and high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Ambulance drivers are part of the prehospital care team and therefore play a critical role in providing cardiopulmonary resuscitation to cardiac arrest patient. As present, there is no study that has been developed to assess the knowledge, attitude and confidence regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation among ambulance drivers. Thus, this study has developed a reliable and validated a questionnaire called AmKAC to evaluate their knowledge, attitude and confidence. The questionnaires are available in two languages, English and Bahasa Malaysia, in view of different educational background. The content validity was then assessed by content experts. Subsequently, the questionnaires underwent face validity which were pretested among 10 ambulance drivers to check for the understanding, language and readability. Afterwards, the refined questionnaires were administered to 108 ambulance drivers from the emergency trauma department of six different hospitals. The process was repeated one week after for the retest. This study reviewed reliable questionnaires in measuring knowledge, attitude and confidence among ambulance driver with Cronbach's alpha of 0.685, 0.703 and 0.905, respectively. In addition, the questionnaire also showed good test-retest reliability and correlation between the items, by using Spearman's rho and intraclass coefficient, respectively. In conclusion, the developed, validated AmKAC can be used in future to provide better insights of the ambulance drivers knowledge, attitude and confidence level regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation permitting organization of courses and training.
\end{abstract}\def\keywordstitle{Keywords}

\begin{keywords}Attitude,\newline Cardiopulmonary resuscitation,\newline Confidence,\newline Knowledge
\end{keywords}
\twocolumn[ \maketitle {\printKwdAbsBox}]
\makeatletter{\raggedright\textsuperscript{*}Corresponding Author\par Name:\ Jamie~Foong~Siew~Wei~\\ Phone:\ +60-126916719~\\  Email:\ euphrasiajamie@gmail.com
        \par}\vspace*{-11pt}\hrulefill\par{\fontsize{12}{14}\selectfont ISSN: 0975-7538}\par% 
        \textsc{DOI:}\ \href{https://doi.org/10.26452/\@journalDoi}{\textcolor{blue}{\underline{\smash{https://doi.org/10.26452/\@journalDoi}}}}\par%
        \vspace*{-11pt}\hrulefill\\{\fontsize{9.12}{10.12}\selectfont Production and Hosted by}\par{IJRPS |~\href{https://ijrps.com}{https://ijrps.com}}\par%
        \vspace*{-2pt}{\fontsize{9.12}{10.12}\selectfont\textcopyright\ \@copyrightYear\ $|$ All rights reserved.}\par%
        \vspace*{-11pt}\rule{\linewidth}{1.2pt}
        \makeatother
        
    
\section{Introduction}
Cardiac arrest is a cessation of cardiac activity that leads to circulatory arrest due to inadequate cardiac output. The causes of cardiac arrests can be cardiac or noncardiac, for instance, trauma, primary respiratory arrest, overdose and others. The cardiac etiology predominates and has been reported in 70-85\% of cases \unskip~\citep{596703:13876015}. Out of hospital cardiac arrest is a major cause of death worldwide \unskip~\citep{596703:13876014}, including Malaysia. In Malaysia, there were 10-24 cases of out of hospital cardiac arrest per month \unskip~\citep{596703:13876018}. Furthermore, a cardiac arrest has contributed to a large amount of cost of care as well as the loss of a number of productive years due to cardiac arrest death and disability \unskip~\citep{596703:13876062}. The outcome from out of hospital cardiac arrest remains poor, with only 10.8\% of adult patients that received resuscitations, survived to hospital discharge \unskip~\citep{596703:13876016}. Asia has the lowest survival rates \unskip~\citep{596703:13876008}. Thus, all out of hospital cardiac arrest patients require immediate emergency medical intervention and high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation as chances of survival rate reduces with each minute delay in initiating cardiopulmonary resuscitation \unskip~\citep{596703:13876015}. Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation have a higher rate of return of spontaneous circulation compared to late cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 33\% and 20\% respectively \unskip~\citep{596703:13876015}. In addition, Hasselqvist-Ax, Ingela, et al. found that there was a significant association between the time of cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation and the 30 days survival rate. The survival rate reduced with increase time of cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation \unskip~\citep{596703:13876013}. As present, pre-hospital care in Malaysia usually consists of paramedics and ambulance drivers, and occasionally a medical doctor \unskip~\citep{596703:13876010}. Nowadays, pre-hospital services have become more develop in which ambulance drivers no longer serve as only drivers. They are considered as responder who will provide basic first aid in addition to being credentialed to drive ambulances. Hence, they play a crucial role in providing cardiopulmonary resuscitation to cardiac arrest victims. Thus, we developed a questionnaire to assess their knowledge, attitude and confidence as there was no study done before to evaluate the ambulance driver's knowledge, attitude and confidence. We believe that through the questionnaire, it may benefit in future to develop a well-planned and sustainable training program.
    
\section{Materials and Methods}
\textbf{Participants}

Participants enrolled were ambulance drivers who are currently working at the Emergency and Trauma Department from six hospitals including Ampang Hospital, Putrajaya Hospital, Tengku Ampuan Rahimah Hospital, Banting Hospital, Kajang Hospital and Tuanku Ja'afar Hospital excluding those who are not willing to participate. 

\textbf{KAC Questionnaire}

The questionnaire (AmKAC) was developed to assess three main domains, knowledge, attitude and confidence regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The questions were designed based on extensive literature search and expert reviews. Furthermore, they were developed according to the American Heart Association Guidelines 2015 and European resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015. In addition, local guidelines were also used as a reference, which was the Ministry of Health policies, Policy on Resuscitation Training and Emergency Medicine and Trauma Services.

There are four sections in the questionnaire. The first section is regarding demographic questions whilst the other three sections are regarding knowledge, attitude and confidence domains which comprised of 37 items that include both positively and negatively worded items. 

The first domain is developed to test the knowledge about cardiopulmonary resuscitation that consists of 14 questions with true or false answer. A true answer will be scored one, and the false answer will be scored zero. On the other hand, the second domain which encompasses 13 items intended to evaluate the attitude of the ambulance drivers regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Likert scale was used ranging from `1' for strongly disagree to `5' for strongly agree. The last domain assessed the confidence level of the drivers in providing cardiopulmonary resuscitation to a cardiac arrest patient. Confidence domain consists of 10 questions in total in Likert scale as well, `1' Not very confident to `5' very confident. Table~\ref{tw-3dfd04c2dcc0} shows the domains and scoring for knowledge, attitude and confidence questionnaire. 


\begin{table*}[!htbp]
\caption{\boldmath {Domain content and scoring for Knowledge, Attitude and Confidence (KAC) on the questionnaire} }
\label{tw-3dfd04c2dcc0}
\def\arraystretch{1.1}
\ignorespaces 
\centering 
\begin{tabulary}{\linewidth}{p{\dimexpr.2365\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.23839999999999996\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.5251\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}}
\tbltoprule \rowcolor{kwdboxcolor}Domains & No of Items & Scoring\\
\tblmidrule 
Knowledge &
  14 &
  Dichotomous 1=True, 0=False\\
Attitude &
  13 &
  5-point Likert scale 1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree\\
Confidence &
  10 &
  5-point Likert scale 1=Not very confident, 5=Very confident\\
\tblbottomrule 
\end{tabulary}\par 
\end{table*}
Appendix A shows the questionnaires that had been developed to assess the knowledge, attitude and confidence regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation among ambulance drivers in Malaysia. Appendix A comprises Figure~\ref{f-8c9ef7b74da4} to Figure~\ref{f-4fba26cef5d4}. 

Figure~\ref{f-8c9ef7b74da4} is regarding instructions on answering the questionnaires, demographics of the participants and the three sections of the questionnaires and their total items. On the other hand, Figure~\ref{f-4fba26cef5d4} displays the knowledge, attitude and confidence sections.


\bgroup
\fixFloatSize{images/f2a974b5-7975-42fb-81cb-1e0f0bb8e026-upicture1.png}
\begin{figure}[!htbp]
\centering \makeatletter\IfFileExists{images/f2a974b5-7975-42fb-81cb-1e0f0bb8e026-upicture1.png}{\includegraphics{images/f2a974b5-7975-42fb-81cb-1e0f0bb8e026-upicture1.png}}{}
\makeatother 
\caption{\boldmath {Instructions on answering the questionnaires, demographics of the participants and the three sections of the questionnaires and their total items }}
\label{f-8c9ef7b74da4}
\end{figure}
\egroup

\bgroup
\fixFloatSize{images/8f85eb07-68ff-4df2-9eff-12e3cd7ea93a-upicture2.png}
\begin{figure}[!htbp]
\centering \makeatletter\IfFileExists{images/8f85eb07-68ff-4df2-9eff-12e3cd7ea93a-upicture2.png}{\includegraphics{images/8f85eb07-68ff-4df2-9eff-12e3cd7ea93a-upicture2.png}}{}
\makeatother 
\caption{\boldmath {The knowledge, confidence and the attitude sections }}
\label{f-4fba26cef5d4}
\end{figure}
\egroup
\textbf{Translation Process}

The knowledge, attitude and confidence items were translated into Malay language and back-translated by bilingual emergency physicians fluent in both the English and Malay languages. Any discrepancies were discussed and came to the consensus among the expert panel consists of experts fluent in both English and Malay languages from the disciplines of Emergency Medicine and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. The process was done according to the four stages described by Guillemin \unskip~\citep{596703:13876012}. The translation to Malay languages is done in view of ambulance drivers coming from a different educational background. 

\textbf{Content Validity}

The questionnaires were sent to three experts to ascertain the content validity. Experts are defined as emergency physicians who graduated from an Emergency Medicine postgraduate specialist training program and are currently practicing. The items were assessed for the key aspects of content validity, which include clarity, relevance and representativeness in addition to appropriate grammar and language.

\textbf{Face Validity}

The questionnaires were administered to 10 ambulance drivers from the Emergency and Trauma Department to check for participant's understanding of items, as well as to check for language, clarity and readability. They were encouraged to ask questions and were interviewed upon completion of the questionnaires. This was performed to reduce the bias of the researcher and to ensure the domains defined by researchers matches the respondent's perspective.

\textbf{Pilot test and test-retest reliability}

The refined questionnaires were then distributed to the participants, and a total of 108 ambulance drivers were recruited. The questionnaires were re-administered to the same participants 1 week after the initial test. All participants completed the initial and subsequent questionnaires. 

\textbf{Statistical Analysis }

The data were collected and analyzed using the IBM SPSS statistical package version 23. The collected questionnaires with two or more missing responses were eliminated in subsequent statistical analyses. Categorical data were demonstrated as frequencies with percentages in parenthesis.

The questionnaire consisted of 14 questions related to knowledge. A 2-scale will be used, ranging from \{0\} = `\{False\}' to \{1\} = `\{True\}'. Thus, a minimum sample size of 70 is required to produce good Cronbach's alpha and correct factor solution with a rule of thumb to calculate the sample size. With an additional 20\% dropout rate, the sample size is 88 samples. \unskip~\citep{596703:13876009}. 

The internal consistency of the knowledge, attitude and confidence were analyzed using Cronbach's alpha coefficients, inter-item correlations and item-total correlations. The item-total correlation was used to assess the homogeneity of the items in the domain. A correlation value of above 0.2 was taken as the rule of thumb as an item with a value below 0.20 should be discarded \unskip~\citep{596703:13876020}. In addition, the first time completed questionnaire score (T1) and second time completed questionnaire score (T2) for all knowledge, attitude and confidence domains were evaluated for test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient. Value of between 0.75 and 0.9 based on the 95\% confident interval of the intraclass correlation coefficient estimate means good reliability \unskip~\citep{596703:13876017}. The scores for knowledge, attitude and confidence domains were summed up and were correlated using Spearman's correlation. 

\textbf{Ethics approval }

This study has obtained approval from the Medical Research and Ethics Committee, Ministry of Health Malaysia. (Study ID: NMRR-18-918-40611).
    
\section{Results and Discussion}
There were a total of 108 ambulance drivers with a mean age of 41 years (standard deviation 8.35) completed the knowledge, attitude and confidence questionnaires in Bahasa Malaysia language. There were no missing data. The ambulance driver population exclusively consists of the male gender, and the majority of them has been working as ambulance drivers for the past more than 10 years (n=56, 51.9\%). Five of them have been working for less than 1 year (4.6\%), while a total of those working for 1 to 5 years and 6 to 10 years are 21, 19.4\% and 26, 24.1\% respectively. 

The hospitals that were recruited provide secondary and tertiary care with the majority of participants from Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah, 28 in total, comprises 25.9\% of total participants. The other participants in descending order are from Hospital Tuanku Ja'afar, 20 (18.5\%), Hospital Putrajaya, 19 (17.6), Hospital Banting, 16 (14.8\%), Hospital Kajang, 14 (13\%) and lastly the least participants are from Hospital Ampang which are 11 in total, made up of 10.1\% of the total participants. Almost all the participants had received only secondary education (n=97, 89.8\%) while the remaining 2 participants, 1.9\% received primary education and 9 participants, 8.3\% received tertiary education. Furthermore, nearly half of the participants, 53, 49.1\% had not performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation for the past 6 months. 63 (58.3\%) of the participants had attended the course 5 or less than 5 years ago while 36 of them had participated in the course more than 5 years ago. All the demographic characteristics of the participants are described in Table~\ref{tw-0e1ea9eac423}.


\begin{table*}[!htbp]
\caption{\boldmath {Demographic characteristic of participants} }
\label{tw-0e1ea9eac423}
\def\arraystretch{1.1}
\ignorespaces 
\centering 
\begin{tabulary}{\linewidth}{p{\dimexpr.5847\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.4153\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}}
\tbltoprule \rowcolor{kwdboxcolor}Variables  & N (\%)\\
\tblmidrule 
Age (mean (SD))  &
  40.95 (8.35) \\
Gender   &
  \\
 Male  &
  108 (100.0) \\
\textbf{Current Hospital } &
  \\
 Hospital Ampang  &
  11 (10.2) \\
 Hospital Putrajaya  &
  19 (17.6) \\
 Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah &
  28 (25.9) \\
 Hospital Banting &
  16 (14.8)\\
 Hospital Kajang &
  14 (13.0)\\
 Hospital Tuanku Ja'afar &
  20 (18.5)\\
\textbf{Education} &
  \\
 Primary &
  2 (1.9)\\
 Secondary &
  97 (89.8)\\
 Tertiary &
  9 (8.3)\\
\textbf{Last CPR done} &
  \\
 No &
  13 (12.0)\\
 Yes\ensuremath{\leq }6 months &
  42 (38.9)\\
 Yes{\textgreater}6 month &
  53 (49.1)\\
\textbf{Previous BLS Attendance} &
  \\
 No &
  9 (8.3)\\
 Yes\ensuremath{\leq }5 years &
  63 (58.3)\\
 Yes{\textgreater}5 years &
  36 (33.3)\\
\textbf{Duration of service as ambulance drivers} &
  \\
 {\textless}1 year &
  5 (4.6)\\
 1-5 years &
  21 (19.4)\\
 6-10 years &
  26 (24.1)\\
 {\textgreater}10 years &
  56 (51.9)\\
\tblbottomrule 
\end{tabulary}\par 
\end{table*}
\textbf{Validation with AmKAC and test-retest reliability}

A total of 108 individuals completed the AmKAC questionnaire. The AmKAC revealed good test-retest reliability with Spearman's rho of 0.709, 0.603 and 0.548 for knowledge, attitude and confidence, respectively. Moreover, the good reliability for all the domains were further demonstrated by intraclass coefficient T1-T2 of more than 0.75, which were 0.777, 0.754 and 0.751 for knowledge, attitude and confidence, respectively, (See Tables~\ref{tw-e83102bb3d97}, \ref{tw-6b4d92799893} and~\ref{tw-0c3ef54a7773}).


\begin{table*}[!htbp]
\caption{\boldmath {Cronbach's alpha score for overall knowledge score} }
\label{tw-e83102bb3d97}
\centering 
\begin{threeparttable}

\def\arraystretch{1.1}
\ignorespaces 
\centering 
\begin{tabulary}{\linewidth}{p{\dimexpr.48269999999999996\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.51730000000000004\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}}
\tbltoprule \rowcolor{kwdboxcolor}Knowledge  & N=108\\
\tblmidrule 
Mean score T1 (SD) &
  8.27 (1.53)\\
Mean score T2 (SD) &
  8.47 (1.58)\\
Cronbach Alpha T1 &
  0.685\\
Mean inter-item correlation T1 &
  0.113\\
Mean inter-item correlation T1-T2 &
  0.638\\
Correlation T1-T2, Spearman's rho &
  0.709**\\
Intraclass coefficient T1-T2 &
  0.777\\
\tblbottomrule 
\end{tabulary}\par 
\begin{tablenotes}\footnotesize 
    
\item{T1 = first time completed questionnaire; T2 = second time questionnaire was completed by 108 participants}
\end{tablenotes}
\end{threeparttable}

\end{table*}

\begin{table*}[!htbp]
\caption{\boldmath {Cronbach's alpha score for overall attitude score} }
\label{tw-6b4d92799893}
\centering 
\begin{threeparttable}

\def\arraystretch{1.1}
\ignorespaces 
\centering 
\begin{tabulary}{\linewidth}{p{\dimexpr.4897\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.5103\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}}
\tbltoprule \rowcolor{kwdboxcolor}Attitude & N=108 \\
\tblmidrule 
Mean score T1 (SD)  &
  47.36 (5.62)\\
Mean score T2 (SD)  &
  48.55 (5.32)\\
Cronbach Alpha T1  &
  0.703\\
Mean inter-item correlation T1 &
  0.151\\
Mean inter-item correlation T1-T2 &
  0.618\\
Correlation T1-T2, Spearman's rho  &
  0.630**\\
Intraclass coefficient T1-T2  &
  0.754\\
\tblbottomrule 
\end{tabulary}\par 
\begin{tablenotes}\footnotesize 
    
\item{T1 = first time completed questionnaire; T2 = second-time questionnaire was completed by 108 participants}
\end{tablenotes}
\end{threeparttable}

\end{table*}

\begin{table*}[!htbp]
\caption{\boldmath {Cronbach's alpha score for the overall confidence score} }
\label{tw-0c3ef54a7773}
\centering 
\begin{threeparttable}

\def\arraystretch{1.1}
\ignorespaces 
\centering 
\begin{tabulary}{\linewidth}{p{\dimexpr.5553\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.4447\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}}
\tbltoprule \rowcolor{kwdboxcolor}Confidence & N=108 \\
\tblmidrule 
Mean score T1 (SD)  &
  32.75 (6.36)\\
Mean score T2 (SD)  &
  34.68 (6.27)\\
Cronbach Alpha T1  &
  0.905\\
Mean inter-item correlation T1 &
  0.491\\
Mean inter-item correlation T1-T2 &
  0.594\\
Correlation T1-T2, Spearman's rho  &
  0.548**\\
Intraclass coefficient T1-T2  &
  0.751\\
\tblbottomrule 
\end{tabulary}\par 
\begin{tablenotes}\footnotesize 
    
\item{T1 = first time completed questionnaire; T2 = second time questionnaire was completed by 108 participants }
\end{tablenotes}
\end{threeparttable}

\end{table*}
\textbf{Cronbach's Alpha for AmKAC}

Table~\ref{tw-f71f8f7e1667} and Table~\ref{tw-2a3093cac42c} show good internal consistency reliability for attitude (\ensuremath{\alpha }=0703), and confidence (\ensuremath{\alpha }=0.905) as the Cronbach's alpha value is more than 0.70 \unskip~\citep{596703:13876019}. The knowledge domain showed moderate Cronbach's alpha value of 0.685, (see Table~\ref{tw-c14d0f616d53}).

Majority of the items in the three domains demonstrated acceptable item-total correlation apart from two items from the knowledge and one item from the attitude domain. The two items from knowledge domain, item K7 which asked regarding checking victim's responsiveness by tapping gently on the shoulder and call loudly (0.143) and item K14 which asked regarding defibrillation/shock is indicated in asystole (0.107). Whilst the item A10 item with the item-total correlation value of 0.068 (Are you willing to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation on healthy 80 years old victim) displayed low inter-item correlation, (see Tables~\ref{tw-c14d0f616d53}, \ref{tw-f71f8f7e1667} and~\ref{tw-2a3093cac42c}).


\begin{table*}[!htbp]
\caption{\boldmath {The overall mean score, standard deviation and Cronbach Alpha for each item in Knowledge domain of AmKAC} }
\label{tw-c14d0f616d53}
\def\arraystretch{1.1}
\ignorespaces 
\centering 
\begin{tabulary}{\linewidth}{p{\dimexpr.095\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.0738\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.12110000000000001\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.109\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.12899999999999999\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.11370000000000001\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.1173\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.1211\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.12\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}}
\tbltoprule \rowcolor{kwdboxcolor}Question & Mean & Standard Deviation & Skewness & Standard  \mbox{}\protect\newline Error & Kurtosis & Standard \mbox{}\protect\newline Error & Corrected \mbox{}\protect\newline Item-Total \mbox{}\protect\newline Correlation & Cronbach's Alpha if item deleted\\
\tblmidrule 
K1 &
  0.94  &
  0.23  &
  -3.585  &
  0.233  &
  11.058  &
  0.461  &
  0.211  &
  0.688 \\
K2 &
  0.88  &
  0.33  &
  -2.366  &
  0.233  &
  3.667  &
  0.461  &
  0.350  &
  0.664 \\
K3 &
  0.89  &
  0.32  &
  -2.510  &
  0.233  &
  4.380  &
  0.461  &
  0.215  &
  0.679 \\
K4 &
  0.59  &
  0.49  &
  -0.382  &
  0.233  &
  -1.889  &
  0.461  &
  0.546  &
  0.625 \\
K5 &
  0.92  &
  0.28  &
  -3.058  &
  0.233  &
  7.488  &
  0.461  &
  0.200  &
  0.684 \\
K6 &
  0.59  &
  0.49  &
  -0.382  &
  0.233  &
  -1.889  &
  0.461  &
  0.557  &
  0.623 \\
K7 &
  0.93  &
  0.26  &
  -3.299  &
  0.233  &
  9.049  &
  0.461  &
  0.143  &
  0.702 \\
K8 &
  0.89  &
  0.32  &
  -2.510  &
  0.233  &
  4.380  &
  0.461  &
  0.242  &
  0.676 \\
K9 &
  0.78  &
  0.42  &
  -1.355  &
  0.233  &
  -0.167  &
  0.461  &
  0.379  &
  0.657 \\
K10 &
  0.69  &
  0.47  &
  -0.809  &
  0.233  &
  -1.372  &
  0.461  &
  0.367  &
  0.659 \\
K11 &
  0.91  &
  0.29  &
  -2.851  &
  0.233  &
  6.242  &
  0.461  &
  0.202  &
  0.680 \\
K12 &
  0.81  &
  0.40  &
  -1.566  &
  0.233  &
  0.460  &
  0.461  &
  0.290  &
  0.671 \\
K13 &
  0.63  &
  0.49  &
  -0.544  &
  0.233  &
  -1.736  &
  0.461  &
  0.476  &
  0.639 \\
K14 &
  0.89  &
  0.32  &
  -2.510  &
  0.233  &
  4.380  &
  0.461  &
  0.107  &
  0.691 \\
\tblbottomrule 
\end{tabulary}\par 
\end{table*}

\begin{table*}[!htbp]
\caption{\boldmath {The overall mean score, standard deviation and Cronbach Alpha for each item in Attitude domain of AmKAC} }
\label{tw-f71f8f7e1667}
\def\arraystretch{1.1}
\ignorespaces 
\centering 
\begin{tabulary}{\linewidth}{p{\dimexpr.0919\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.10870000000000001\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.1128\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.11280000000000001\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.11549999999999999\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.1091\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.11\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.1192\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.12\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}}
\tbltoprule \rowcolor{kwdboxcolor}Question & Mean & Standard Deviation & Skewness & Standard  \mbox{}\protect\newline Error & Kurtosis & Standard \mbox{}\protect\newline Error & Corrected \mbox{}\protect\newline Item-Total \mbox{}\protect\newline Correlation & Cronbach's Alpha if item deleted\\
\tblmidrule 
A1  &
  4.26  &
  0.86  &
  -2.068  &
  0.233  &
  5.967  &
  0.461  &
  0.505  &
  0.610 \\
A2  &
  4.31  &
  0.76  &
  -1.785  &
  0.233  &
  5.734  &
  0.461  &
  0.613  &
  0.600 \\
A3  &
  2.59  &
  1.12  &
  0.234  &
  0.233  &
  -1.334  &
  0.461  &
  0.200  &
  0.678 \\
A4  &
  4.00  &
  0.95  &
  -0.908  &
  0.233  &
  0.642  &
  0.461  &
  0.600  &
  0.590 \\
A5  &
  4.40  &
  0.78  &
  -1.600  &
  0.233  &
  3.591  &
  0.461  &
  0.633  &
  0.596 \\
A6  &
  3.23  &
  0.98  &
  -0.121  &
  0.233  &
  -0.381  &
  0.461  &
  0.329  &
  0.634 \\
A7  &
  3.42  &
  1.02  &
  -0.752  &
  0.233  &
  -0.473  &
  0.461  &
  0.249  &
  0.648 \\
A8  &
  2.73  &
  1.06  &
  0.037  &
  0.233  &
  -0.705  &
  0.461  &
  0.235  &
  0.662 \\
A9  &
  4.00  &
  0.93  &
  -1.397  &
  0.233  &
  2.202  &
  0.461  &
  0.280 &
  0.648 \\
A10  &
  2.74  &
  1.25  &
  0.184  &
  0.233  &
  -0.981  &
  0.461  &
  0.068  &
  0.703 \\
A11 &
  3.91 &
  0.92 &
  -1.234 &
  0.233 &
  1.496 &
  0.461 &
  0.406 &
  0.623\\
A12 &
  3.91 &
  0.97 &
  -1.367 &
  0.233 &
  1.832 &
  0.461 &
  0.210 &
  0.653\\
A13 &
  3.92 &
  0.92 &
  -1.086 &
  0.233 &
  1.218 &
  0.461 &
  0.256 &
  0.660\\
\tblbottomrule 
\end{tabulary}\par 
\end{table*}

\begin{table*}[!htbp]
\caption{\boldmath {The overall mean score, standard deviation and Cronbach Alpha for each item in Confidence domain of AmKAC} }
\label{tw-2a3093cac42c}
\def\arraystretch{1.1}
\ignorespaces 
\centering 
\begin{tabulary}{\linewidth}{p{\dimexpr.1053\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.10360000000000001\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.10639999999999999\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.1201\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.11\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.09890000000000002\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.1054\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.1303\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}p{\dimexpr.12\linewidth-2\tabcolsep}}
\tbltoprule \rowcolor{kwdboxcolor}Question & Mean & Standard Deviation & Skewness & Standard  \mbox{}\protect\newline Error & Kurtosis & Standard \mbox{}\protect\newline Error & Corrected \mbox{}\protect\newline Item-Total \mbox{}\protect\newline Correlation & Cronbach's Alpha if item deleted\\
\tblmidrule 
C1  &
  3.50  &
  0.88  &
  -0.251  &
  0.233  &
  -0.281  &
  0.461  &
  0.697  &
  0.893 \\
C2  &
  3.64  &
  0.84  &
  -0.792  &
  0.233  &
  1.393  &
  0.461  &
  0.730  &
  0.891 \\
C3  &
  3.08  &
  1.00  &
  -0.632  &
  0.233  &
  -0.635  &
  0.461  &
  0.575  &
  0.902 \\
C4  &
  3.24  &
  0.86  &
  -0.401  &
  0.233  &
  -0.523  &
  0.461  &
  0.707  &
  0.892 \\
C5  &
  3.06  &
  0.86  &
  -0.197  &
  0.233  &
  -0.991  &
  0.461  &
  0.649  &
  0.896 \\
C6  &
  3.87  &
  0.88  &
  -1.355  &
  0.233  &
  2.376  &
  0.461  &
  0.700  &
  0.893 \\
C7  &
  3.56  &
  0.92  &
  -0.679  &
  0.233  &
  0.678  &
  0.461  &
  0.721  &
  0.891 \\
C8  &
  2.87  &
  0.70  &
  -0.824  &
  0.233  &
  1.295  &
  0.461  &
  0.641  &
  0.897 \\
C9  &
  3.06  &
  0.88  &
  -0.212  &
  0.233  &
  0.515  &
  0.461  &
  0.647  &
  0.896 \\
C10  &
  2.87  &
  0.83  &
  -0.246  &
  0.233  &
  0.384  &
  0.461  &
  0.570  &
  0.901 \\
\tblbottomrule 
\end{tabulary}\par 
\end{table*}
AmKAC revealed good internal validity and test-retest reliability. Majority of the 37 original items of AmKAC demonstrated acceptable item-total correlation apart from two items from the knowledge and one item from attitude domains. The two items from knowledge domain, item K7 which asked regarding checking victim's responsiveness by tapping gently on the shoulder and call loudly and item K14 which asked regarding defibrillation/shock is indicated in asystole. Whilst the A10 item (Are you willing to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation on healthy 80 years old victim) displayed low item-total correlation. The items that showed low item correlation may be discarded. In addition, the study demonstrated good intraclass coefficients. 

Cardiac arrest is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. In the United states, nearly 90\% of the out of hospital cardiac arrest are fatal, with more than 356,000 that occurred annually. The outcome of a cardiac arrest depends on critical intervention, including effective chest compressions and assisted ventilation. Survival to hospital discharge was 10.8\% among adults (9\% with good neurological function). Hence, in view of the importance of high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation, we developed and validated the AmKAC questionnaire to assess the knowledge, attitude and confidence regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation among ambulance drivers in Malaysia as they are part of the pre-hospital care team in addition to being the first medical team to attend out of hospital cardiac arrest victim. The questionnaire will provide us with better insights into their understanding of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The questionnaire was designed in such a way to be a user-friendly self-administered tool. 

Our study was the first study to evaluate the knowledge, attitude and confidence regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation among ambulance drivers. It revealed inadequate knowledge regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Specifically, the questions that were relating to the rate and depth of chest compression as well as regarding compulsory pulse check before performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation, less than 30 \% of the participant answered correctly which was similar to a study conducted by Majid et al, in which nearly two thirds of the participants wrongly identified the correct rate. Likewise, Olajumoke et al. conducted a study to explore the knowledge and attitude regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation among medical practitioners that demonstrated inadequate knowledge and incompetency in performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation with only 24 (36.9\%) of the participants scored above average in answering questions related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Other studies also revealed insufficient knowledge among medical field related personnel. The insufficient knowledge could be due to lacking in structured training of Basic Life Support/cardiopulmonary resuscitation, lack of regular involvement in resuscitation or limited attendance in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training programmes.

Multiple efforts have been made to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills and knowledge, and yet it showed little improvement in skills and knowledge retention. Interestingly, there is a theory of reasoned action that is used to explain human behavior Behaviour is usually under one's control and intention. Attitude is one of the behavioural intentions. In order to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation on out of hospital cardiac arrest victims, firstly one must be trained. Secondly, the person who have underwent the training must be willing to use their skills in addition to able to recall correctly of what have been learnt to perform the cardiopulmonary resuscitation effectively. A positive attitude will affect CPR skill acquisition and retention. For instance, if one thinks that cardiopulmonary resuscitation will improve the patient's chance of survival, there is no hesitancy in initiating cardiopulmonary resuscitation thus resulting in the skill being performed in addition to being reinforced. In our case, the study has demonstrated a good attitude among the ambulance drivers, and therefore, it is a good start to allow planning of interventions to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills. A similar finding was demonstrated in the studies conducted by Saquib et al. and Shrestha, Batajoo, Piryani, \& Mw that showed positive results despite lacking in knowledge. Besides that, our study revealed insufficient confidence particularly in performing defibrillation, which was also displayed in a study conducted at a hospital in Southern Finland that was conducted to explore regarding attitudes of the nurses towards cardiopulmonary resuscitation with defibrillation.

A study conducted by Dyson et al. reported the patient survival will decrease when paramedics had not treated out of hospital cardiac arrest for more than 6 months. This period is concordant to the time of skill deterioration of Advanced Life Support skills (6-12months) after training. Nearly half of the participants in our study, 53, 49.1\% had not performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation for the past 6 months.  Unfortunately, resuscitation skills will reduce as time passes. Hence, the out of hospital cardiac arrest treatment will fall below the recommended standard. Thus, it is critical to organize more regular refresher course sustain optimum resuscitation skills in order to maximize cardiac arrest victim survival rate. 

Attitude and confidence items have displayed good reliability. Cronbach's alpha coefficient value of 0.7 or greater is considered acceptable to measure the reliability of the knowledge items. However, there are multiple studies that were conducted regarding knowledge showed Cronbach's alpha value ranging from 0.50 to 0.80 \unskip~\citep{596703:13876011}. The study revealed Cronbach's alpha value of 0.685, which is acceptable in view of ambulance drivers come from various educational backgrounds from secondary to tertiary level. Furthermore, the questionnaires were translated to the Malay language due to a similar reason. 

There were two items from knowledge domain, item K7 which asked regarding checking victim's responsiveness by tapping gently on the shoulder and call loudly and item K14 which asked regarding defibrillation/shock is indicated in asystole and one item from attitude domain the A10 item (Are you willing to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation on healthy 80 years old victim) displayed low item-total correlation, Therefore the items can be discarded to improve the internal consistency of the scale. 

There is a limited number of ambulance drivers in each of the hospitals. However, they are managed under the same standard of the procedure, and thus, the sampling taken can represent the other drivers in other states. Besides that, the duration between the test and retest was quite short, which might cause bias due to learning effect attributable to time constraint. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that was conducted to assess knowledge, attitude and confidence regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation among ambulance drivers. Future study may be recommended to be conducted involving larger sample population to further evaluate and explore our current findings.
    
\section{Conclusion}
AmKAC questionnaire has now been proven to be valid and reliable and is available in both English and Malay Language. Future studies can be done involving a larger population of ambulance drivers from all over the states in Malaysia. It is hoped that the questionnaire may benefit in future in order to develop a well-planned and sustainable training program with periodical reinforcements and refresher courses as early quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation will improve the survival rate in cardiac arrest victims. 
    

\bibliographystyle{pharmascope_apa-custom}

\bibliography{\jobname}
\end{document}
