RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for the Estimation of Midostaurin in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form


Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy, Dr M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute, Velappanchavadi, Chennai-600 077, Tamil Nadu, India, +91-9003059852
Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Seven Hills College of Pharmacy, Tirupati-517 561, Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract

An elementary, Valid, speedy and decisive strategy was developed to determine Midostaurin quantitatively in a fixed dosage form. Effective Chromatographic separation of Midostaurin was achieved by using Hypersil C18 Column (250 mm X 4.6 mm internal diameter, five μm particle size) using a mobile phase composed of Methanol and Buffer in the proportion of 75:25(by volume). The Mobile phase was siphoned using a gradient HPLC system at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min, and quantification was based on peak area measurement at 270 nm. RT (Retention Time) for Midostaurin was 2.142 min, and dimensionality of Midostaurin was found to be linear with a statistic value of 0.999. The acceptance criteria of precision were relative variance should be less than 2.0%, and also the strategy showed precision 0.3 for Midostaurin, which shows that the tactic was precise. The full Recovery was found to be 99.96 %. Detection Limit and Quantitation Limit values for Midostaurin were found as 0.439 & 1.466. The exactness and authenticity were assessed by evaluation of validation parameters like linearity, precision, specificity, accuracy, LOD, LOQ values as per ICH guidelines. The proposed strategy has been applied to the formulation without additives interference and specific for the estimation of Midostaurin.

Keywords

Midostaurin, Accuracy, Linearity, Precision, Specificity

Introduction

Midostaurin is chemically N-((9S,10R,11R,13R)-10-methoxy-9-methyl-1-oxo-2, 3, 10, 11, 12, 13-hexahydro-9,13-epoxy-1H,9H-diindolo(1,2,3-GH:3',2',1'-lm)pyrrolo(3,4j)(1,7)benzodiazonin-11-yl)-n-methylbenzamide (as Rydapt) used for the treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in adults (Ahmed, Mahtab, & Saleem, 2018; Valent et al., 2017) having molecular formula C35H30N4O4 and Molecular Weight 570.649 g/mol (Kim, 2017). It is being used in the treatment of cancer, myelodysplastic syndrome (He et al., 2017) and systemic mastocytosis (Fischer et al., 2010) showing activity towards hematopoietic tumours. It mainly works by slowing the growth of cancer cells and certain immune system cells (Andel, Rosing, Schellens, & Beijnen, 2018). The chemical structure of Midostaurin is exhibited in Figure 1.

The current strategy focused on isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography method for the estimation of Midostaurin. After performing extensive literature Survey on chromatographic analysis of several dosage forms (Desai, Chavan, Amane, Shete, & Dhole, 2019; Sangameshwar, Kanthale, Thonte, & Mahapatra, 2019), an attempt was made to develop a new valid (Vidushi & Meenakshi, 2017) , elementary, speedy and Decisive method for the estimation of Midostaurin in a fixed dosage form.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and Reagents

Nutech Labs Pvt Ltd kindly gifted Midostaurin, Hyderabad certified to contain acceptable purity limit and was used without any refinement. Solvents of HPLC grade were used in Chromatographic separation of Midostaurin. Rydapt capsules (label claim 25 mg of Midostaurin) of Novartis were utilized for analysis.

Instrument

Liquid Chromatography system used consists of Waters HPLC having Empower Software with 2695 separation module having PDA detector with universal loop injector of injection capacity 20 μL. The column used was Agilent C18 Column, 5μ (250× 4.6 mm) at surrounding temperature. Several mobile phases were tested to search out the suitable conditions to separate the Drug.

Optimized Chromatographic conditions

The mobile phase having Methanol and Phosphate buffer having four pH in a proportion of 75:25 by volume was preferred because it ideally resolves the height with Retention Time (RT) of 2.142 minutes for Midostaurin, respectively. Standard Drug was scanned over a broad range of wavelength ranging from 200 nm to 390 nm, and wavelength was selected at 270 nm because of showing reasonably good response with characteristic UV Spectrum as exhibited in Figure 2.

Preparation of Buffer

Accurately weighed and transferred 3.464 g of Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate into 1000 ml clean, dry volumetric flask.

To this add 500 ml of HPLC water and sonicated for five minutes to dissolve it entirely and make up the volume to mark with HPLC water and pH was adjusted to four by addition of few drops of Orthophosphoric acid.

Preparation of Mobile Phase

Accurately measured 750 millilitres of Methanol (75%) and 250 millilitres of phosphate buffer (25%) were mixed and kept for sonication in inaudible water tub for 10 minutes and after sonication filter the above solution using 0.45 µ membrane filter under vacuum prior its use and used as a diluent

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/3cfa8502-f343-488e-a82f-f86e1645dee0/image/2fddcef3-20f5-410b-8651-abe887fd2523-upicture1.png
Figure 1: Chemical Structure of Midostaurin

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/3cfa8502-f343-488e-a82f-f86e1645dee0/image/c5f7541f-378c-4cb4-a4de-a5c002e17d16-upicture2.png
Figure 2: Overlain UV spectrum of Midostaurin

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/3cfa8502-f343-488e-a82f-f86e1645dee0/image/e8f66dc6-f0e1-45bb-a12d-eba0a3bf7848-upicture3.png
Figure 3: Standard Solution Chromatogram

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/3cfa8502-f343-488e-a82f-f86e1645dee0/image/912cfc88-db18-41ee-a90c-007ed2a01db1-upicture4.png
Figure 4: Sample solution Chromatogram

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/3cfa8502-f343-488e-a82f-f86e1645dee0/image/b3e5e65e-163f-4eb7-9972-6a0c905faa8a-upicture5.png
Figure 5: Linearity Curve of Midostaurin

Table 1: Linearity Data of Midostaurin

S.No

Linearity Level

Concentration(ppm)

Peak Area

I

1

20

1646252

II

2

40

3272416

III

3

60

4838743

IV

4

80

6475024

V

5

100

8312151

Correlation Coefficient

0.999

Table 2: Accuracy Report of Midostaurin

% Concentration

Average Area

Amount Added

(mg)

Amount

found

(mg)

% Recovery

Mean Recovery

50%

1143519

5

4.99

99.81%

99.63%

100%

2938342

10

9.88

99.08%

150%

4452758

15

15.0

100.0%

Table 3: Precision Report of Midostaurin

Peak Name

RT

Area

Height

1

Midostaurin

2.185

824170

158772

2

Midostaurin

2.191

826053

157336

3

Midostaurin

2.204

823442

156124

4

Midostaurin

2.207

818967

155674

5

Midostaurin

2.210

823476

156033

Mean

823221.9

Std.Dev.

2604.2

%RSD

0.3

Table 4: Results of Robustness

S.No

Flow Rate (ml/min)

System Suitability Parameters

Plate Count

Tailing Factor

I

0.8

4517

1.7

II

1.0

4343

1.6

III

1.2

4209

1.6

Table 5: Effect of change in mobile phase Composition

S. No

Mobile phase composition change

Results

Plate Count

Tailing factor

I

<5%

4623

1.6

II

*Actual

4543

1.6

III

>5%

4864

1.6

Standard Stock Preparation

Accurately weighed and transferred 10 mg of Midostaurin working standard into 100 millilitres clean dry volumetric flask and add 70 ml of diluent and degassed for five min to dissolve Midostaurin standard entirely and make volume up to the mark with the identical solvent which gives 100 µg/ml of Midostaurin (Stock solution). From the above solution, 4.0 ml was pipetted out into a ten-millilitre volumetric flask and then makeup to the mark with diluent. The chromatogram was exhibited in Figure 3.

Sample Preparation

A portion of powder equivalent to the weight of 10 mg was accurately weighed and transferred into100 millilitre volumetric flask and diluent of 70 ml was added and degassed for five min to dissolve it completely and makeup to the mark with identical solvent and then the solution was filtered through a 0.45 µ membrane filter. From the above-filtered solution, 4.0 ml was pipetted out into a 10-millilitre volumetric flask and then make up to the final volume with diluent. Similarly, the sample was further diluted to get the required concentration The Chromatogram was exhibited in Figure 4.

Results and Discussion

Table 6: Recovery Data of Formulation

Parameter

Midostaurin

Label claim (mg)

25

Drug found

24.77

% Accuracy

98-102

Preparation of Calibration Curves by HPLC

Serial dilutions of Midostaurin ranging from 10-100 μg/ml were made, and their chromatograms were recorded. Height space of Drug was calculated, and also the individual activity curve was planned against quantitative of the area underneath the curve, and their respective concentrations and results are reported in Table 1.

HPLC Method Validation

The Developed method was validated for Linearity, Accuracy, Specificity, Precision, LOD, LOQ parameters as described in ICH Guidelines.

Linearity and Range

One-dimensionality in a strategy is its ability to induce to take a glance at results and was constructed using the mean areas at their respective concentrations over a given range. Linearity for Midostaurin was within the range of 10 to 100µg/ml, respectively. The coefficient of correlation value for the calibration plot of Midostaurin was 0.999, which shows good linearity for the Drug. The Linearity curve was exhibited in Figure 5.

Accuracy

The Certainty of an approach is that the intimacy of the measured worth to actuality worth for the sample. The proportion recovery of Midostaurin was found to be 99.81%, 99.08% and 100.02% for accuracy 50%, 100% and 150% samples respectively. The mean recovery for Midostaurin is 99.63. The %RSD of the sample was found to be below two and results were tabulated in Table 2.

Precision

The precision of the strategy was evaluated by performing repeatability on the same day and inter-day studies. The Percentage Relative Standard Deviation of each study was calculated and was found to be less than 2 showing the strategy was precise, and the results were shown in Table 3.

LOD & LOQ

Limit of Detection, Limit of Quantitation values of the method were 0.439 and 1.466, respectively. The results obtained are within limits.

Robustness and Ruggedness

Robustness and Ruggedness studies were carried out by injecting five replicate injections of Midostaurin on different days and variations was calculated in terms of percentage relative variance which was found to be less than 2%, and results were reported in Table 5; Table 4.

Recovery studies

Midostaurin standard addition method is performed at 50,100,150 % levels, and interference of formulation additives was tested. The Recovery was calculated based on the amount of Drug found, and results are reported in Table 6.

Conclusions

Different trials were carried out to determine the optimized chromatographic conditions and an initial attempt was performed by utilizing a low proportion of organic solvents for the elution of compound by reducing the retention time of the compound. The proposed chromatographic conditions achieve acceptable results. The proposed method is easy, speedy and measurably substantial. During the analysis of Drug, no interfering peak was found within the chromatogram, indicating that there is no excipient interference.