Study on lipid peroxidation and In vivo antioxidant activity of various extract of Dyschoriste littoralis nees on paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity rats
Abstract
The current investigation was to examine the antioxidant potential of D.littoralis Nees. (family Acanthaceae) On paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. The aerial parts of D.littoralis Nees. The powder was extracted with various solvents (PE, EA, and methanol) through Soxhlet concentrates and various crude concentrates utilized for hepatoprotective activity. Hepatotoxicity was induced by paracetamol (2g/kg b.wt.) on the 5th day of the investigational period and given orally. Paracetamol-induced rats to exhibit elevated activities of TBARS and reduction the enzymes levels such as Superoxide dismutase(SOD), catalase(CAD), Glutathione peroxidise (GPx), Glutathione S transferase(GST) and Glutathione (GSH) in liver and kidney. Furthermore, Oral administration of the ethyl acetate concentrates of D.littoralis (200 mg/ kgb.wt.) given rats were major reduction the level of TBARS and also significantly elevated the levels of the enzyme such as Superoxide dismutase(SOD), catalase(CAD), Glutathione peroxidise(GPx), Glutathione S transferase(GST) and Glutathione (GSH) in liver and kidney as compared to other concentrates. Thus, results suggested that ethyl acetate concentrates of D.littoralis could be afford better antioxidant effect against paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity rats.
Keywords
D.littoralis, Paracetamol, antioxidant enzyme, superoxide dismutase, catalase
Introduction
Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species participate in key roles in the normal physiological process, together with cellular life/death process, protection from pathogens, different cellular signaling pathways, and regulate the vascular tone (Valko et al., 2007). Antioxidants are often used in oils and fatty foods to retard their autoxidation. The generally used synthetic antioxidants at present are BHA, BHT, PG, and TBHQ. However, these drugs are assumed accountable for liver harm and performing as carcinogens in lab animals. Therefore, the importance of the search for natural antioxidants has greatly increased in recent years (Jayaprakasha, Selvi, & Sakariah, 2003). Ethnomedical literature contains a huge amount of herbs that may be used for the various diseases, in which ROS and free radical participate vital responsibility. A huge numerical herbs are used for strong antioxidant activity (Badami, Gupta, & Suresh, 2003). Current reports revealed that there is an opposite relationship between the food intake of antioxidant-rich foods and the incidence of human disorders (Halliwell, 1997).
Dyschoriste littoralis Nees. (family Acanthaceae) Leaves were used for the treatment of wounds Dyschoriste genus were generally known as snake herb. D.littoralis used as the treatment of pain, fever, and inflammation. D.littoralisis was used for the treatment of severe coughs along with administrated ginger. D.littoralisis leaves were used for asthma in the form cigarettes (Awan et al., 2014), and D.littoralisis was used treatment of diarrhea and dysentery. (Hemant, Sharma, & Alagarsamy, 2013). D.littoralisis have various activities like anti-microbial (Hemant et al., 2013) and wound healing. (Subha, Ganthi, & Hemalatha, 2017). Still, no literature available on the lipid peroxidation and antioxidant activity of D.littoralis. Thus, the study to assess hepatoprotective activities of D.littoralis in paracetamol induced rats.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals
Paracetamol was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, the USA utilized in the experiment. All other chemicals and reagents were utilized AR grade
Gathering and Identification of Plant materials
The aerial parts of D.littoralis Nees. (Acanthaceae) were gathered from Tirunelveli District, Tamil Nadu, India. Plant identification was made from Survey of Medicinal Plant Unit (SMP), Govt. Siddha Medical College, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu (Voucher No: 25834). The D.littoralis were desiccated under shadowy, segregate, crushed through a grinder. (Satheeshkumar, KottaiMuthu, & Manavalan, 2011).
Preparation of Plant Concentrates
The pulverized materials were progressively concentratesed with PE (40-600C) through hot constant percolation method in Soxhlet equipment (Harborne, 1984) for twenty-four hours. At that moment, the marc was used to EA (76-780C) for twenty-four hours & then mark was subjected to methanol for twenty-four hours. The concentrates were concentrated through the rotational evaporator and subjected to solidify drying in a lyophilizer till dry powder was acquired (Shajiselvin & KottaiMuthu, 2010).
Animals
Male Wister rats of 17-18 weeks age, weighing 160-185g, were collected from the Central Animal House, MNR College of Pharmacy, Sangareddy, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. The animals were set aside in cages, 2 per cage, with twelve: twelve hours light and dark cycle at 25 ± 2 ºC. The rats were maintained on their particular diets and water ad libitum. Animal Ethical Committee’s clearance was approved by the Ethical Committee of MNR College of Pharmacy, Sangareddy, Hyderabad, Telangana(CPCSEA/COP/05/ 21-01-2019).
Experimental design
Acute toxicity test
Albino Wistar rats were separated in six groups, and each groups contain six animals (n = 6). Rats were fasted for four hours with free access to water only. The various concentrates of D.littoralis suspended in normal saline: 0.5% CMC was administered orally at a dose of 5 mg/kg at first, and mortality was noted for three days. The mortality was noted in 5/6 or 6/6 animals, and then the dose administered was measured as a toxic dose. However, the mortality was noted in less than 4 rats. Out of 6 rats, then the same dose was repeated again to confirm the toxic effect. If mortality was not noted, the procedure was repeated for higher doses i.e., 2000mg/kg.
Hepatoprotective activity
Animals were separated in six groups, and each groups contain six animals.
Group I
Animals served as Control group received with vehicle (0.5% CMC) for 7 days.
Group II
Animals served as a negative control, received 7 days only 1ml vehicle and paracetamol 2g/kg b.wt. given on the 5th-day by orally
Group III
Animals received Pet. Ether concentrates of D.littoralis 200mg/kg b.wt, orally for seven days. On 5th day onwards paracetamol 2g/kg b.wt. Administered by orally.
Group IV
Animals received ethyl acetate concentrates of D.littoralis 200mg/kg b.wt, orally for seven days. On 5th day onwards paracetamol 2g/kg b.wt. Administered by orally.
Group V
Animals received a methanolic concentrates of D.littoralis 200mg/kg b.wt, orally for seven days. On 5th day onwards paracetamol 2g/kg b.wt. Administered by orally.
Group VI
Animals received 25mg/kg b.wt of Silymarin by oral for seven days and on 5th day onwards paracetamol 2g/kg b.wt. Administered by orally.
Groups III, IV, and V rats were orally fed with the various concentrates of D. littoralis( PE, EA, and methanol), and Group VI rats were fed with silymarin. Both the D. littoralis concentrates and silymarin were suspended in 0.5% CMC individually and fed to the particular rats through oral intubation. Next day of experiments 8th day, all the animals were sacrificed through cervical decapitation (Sivakrishnan & KottaiMuthu, 2014). Liver and kidney tissues (250mg) were sliced into pieces and homogenized in appropriate buffer under cold condition (pH 7.0) to give 20% homogenate (w/v). The homogenate was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min at 0 °C in cold centrifuge. The supernatant was used for biochemical estimations.
Liver marker enzymes
(Niehaus & Samuelsson, 1968) method was utilized for the estimation of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances(TBARS). (Kakkar, Das, & Visvanathan, 1984) method was used for the determination of Superoxide dismutase (SOD), (Sinha, 1972) method was used for the determination of Catalase (CAT), (Rotruck et al., 1973) method was used for the determination of Glutathione Peroxidase (GPx), Habig, WH et al., 1974 method was used for the determination of Glutathione –S-Transferase(GST) and (Ellman, 1959) method was used for the determination of Glutathione (GSH), (Lowry, Rosebrough, Farr, & Randall, 1951) method was used for the measurement of protein.
Statistical Analysis
The statistical investigation was conducted by ANOVA, and groups were compared through Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT)using SPSS Software Package, version 10.0. Results were expressed as means ±standard deviation for six rats in each group. A value of P ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results and Discussion
The activity of various concentrates of D.littoralis on tissues TBARS in paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity on Wistar rats
Table 1 appeared the activity of various concentrates of D.littoralis on tissue TBARS in normal and paracetamol-induced hepatotoxic rats. The hepatotoxic control group showed increased the concentration of TBARS. The administration of ethyl acetate concentrates of aerial parts of D.littoralis, and silymarin treated a group of rats attenuated the reduced the level of TBARS.
Groups |
TBARS (n mol of MDA formed/g tissue) |
|
---|---|---|
Liver |
Kidney |
|
Group I |
1.36±0.06 |
1.37±0.04 |
Group II |
2.72±0.05a* |
2.91±0.02a* |
Group III |
2.62±0.04 ** |
2.81±0.03 ** |
Group IV |
1.47±0.04 ** |
1.54±0.02 ** |
Group V |
2.46±0.04 * |
2.38±0.05 * |
Group VI |
1.39±0.05 ** |
1.41±0.02 ** |
#Data be articulated as mean ± SEM., n = six rats each group.
P values, *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ns= not significant; compared to Paracetamol group. One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. a→ Group II compared to Group I; b→ Group II compared to Group III, IV, V, and VI
Effect of various concentrates of D.littoralis on tissue enzymatic antioxidant in paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity in Wistar rats
Table 2 shows the effect of various concentrates of aerial parts of D.littoralis on tissue SOD in paracetamol-induced hepatotoxic rats. The hepatotoxic control group showed decreased activities of SOD in the liver (3.57±0.02), kidney(4.03±0.05). Administration of PE concentrates of D.littoralis showed considerably SOD in the liver (3.71±0.06) and kidney(4.20±0.03) group III rats. Administration of EA concentrates of D.littoralis showed considerably SOD in the liver (5.80±0.02) and kidney(5.21±0.02) in group IV rats. Administration of methanol concentrates of D.littoralis showed considerably SOD in the liver (4.28±0.03) and kidney(4.48±0.06) in group V rats. The administration of EA concentrates of D.littoralis attenuated the concentration of SOD in liver and kidney, and silymarin restored enzyme activities to normal values.
Groups |
SOD (unit min/mg/protein) |
|
---|---|---|
Liver |
Kidney |
|
Group I |
6.34 ±0.03 |
5.68±0.05 |
Group II |
3.57±0.02a* |
4.03±0.05 a* |
Group III |
3.71±0.06 ** |
4.20±0.03 ** |
Group IV |
5.80±0.02 ** |
5.21 ±0.02 * |
Group V |
4.28±0.03 ** |
4.48±0.06 * |
Group VI |
5.85±0.07 ** |
5.94±0.03 ** |
#Statistical data and details of group I-VI are the same as in Table 1
Table 3 shows the effect of various concentrates of aerial parts of D.littoralis on tissue CAD in paracetamol-induced hepatotoxic rats. The hepatotoxic control group showed decreased activities of CAD in the liver (1.11±0.06), kidney(1.27±0.02). Administration of PE concentrates of D.littoralis showed considerably CAD in the liver (1.25±0.04) and kidney(1.40±0.07) group III rats. Administration of EA concentrates of D.littoralis showed considerably CAD in the liver (2.84±0.04) and kidney(2.87±0.08) in group IV rats. Administration of methanol concentrates of D.littoralis showed considerably CAD in the liver (1.62±0.05) and kidney(1.68±0.05) in group V rats. The administration of EA concentrates of D.littoralis attenuated the concentration of CAD in liver and kidney, and silymarin restored enzyme activities to normal values.
Groups |
CAT (µ moles of H2O2 consumed min/mg/protein) |
|
---|---|---|
Liver |
Kidney |
|
Group I |
3.26±0.08 |
3.42 ± 0.04 |
Group II |
1.11±0.06 a* |
1.27±0.02 a** |
Group III |
1.25±0.04 ** |
1.40±0.07 ** |
Group IV |
2.84±0.04 ** |
2.87±0.08 ** |
Group V |
1.62±0.05 * |
1.68±0.05 ** |
Group VI |
2.97±0.02 ** |
3.21±0.06 * |
#Statistical data and details of group I-VI are the same as in Table 1
Table 4 and Table 5 shows the effect of various concentrates of aerial parts of D.littoralis on tissue Glutathione peroxidase and GST in paracetamol-induced hepatotoxic rats. The hepatotoxic control group showed decreased activities of Glutathione peroxidase in liver (8.68 ± 0.08 ),kidney(9.69 ± 0.05)and GST in liver (11.49 ± 0.10),kidney(12.42 ± 0.12 ). Administration of PE concentrates of D.littoralis showed considerably Glutathione peroxidase in liver (9.42 ± 0.06 ),kidney(10.15 ± 0.06 )and GST in liver (11.72 ± 0.18 ),kidney(12.76 ± 0.08) in group III rats. Administration of EA concentrates of D.littoralis showed considerably Glutathione peroxidase in liver (17.89±0.08),kidney(16.75 ± 0.06) and GST in liver (22.45 ± 0.12 ),kidney(23.43 ± 0.12) in group IV rats. Administration of methanol concentrates of D.littoralis showed considerably Glutathione peroxidase in liver (12.14± 0.05 ),kidney(12.65± 0.08)and GST in liver (13.48 ± 0.12),kidney(14.29 ± 0.13) in group V rats. The administration of EA concentrates of D.littoralis attenuated the concentration of Glutathione peroxidase in liver and GST in liver and kidney, and silymarin restored enzyme activities to normal values. Table 5 as follows,
Groups |
GPx (mg of glutathione consumed/min/mg protein |
|
---|---|---|
Liver |
Kidney |
|
Group I |
21.29 ± 0.04 |
23.85±0.05 |
Group II |
8.68±0.08 a* |
9.69±0.05a* |
Group III |
9.42±0.06 * |
10.15±0.06 ** |
Group IV |
17.89±0.08 ** |
16.75±0.06 * |
Group V |
12.14±0.05 ** |
12.65±0.08 ** |
Group VI |
19.58±0.08 * |
19.12±0.04 ** |
#Statistical data and details of group I-VI are the same as in Table 1
Groups |
GST ((m mole of CDNB – GSH – Conjugate to /min/mg protein) |
|
---|---|---|
Liver |
Kidney |
|
Group I |
26.48 ± 0.12 |
28.64± 0.14 |
Group II |
11.49 ± 0.10 a* |
12.42 ± 0.12 a* |
Group III |
11.72 ± 0.18 ** |
12.76 ± 0.08 ** |
Group IV |
22.45 ± 0.12 * |
23.43 ± 0.12 ** |
Group V |
13.48 ± 0.12 ** |
14.29 ± 0.13 ** |
Group VI |
24.64 ± 0.10 ** |
25.16 ± 0.12 * |
#Statistical data and details of group I-VI are the same as in Table 1
Groups |
GSH(mg/g tissue) |
|
---|---|---|
Liver |
Kidney |
|
Group I |
1.66 ±0.10 |
1.42 ±0.12 |
Group II |
0.65 ±0.08 a* |
0.52 ±0.04 a* |
Group III |
0.72 ±0.06 ** |
0.64 ±0.06 * |
Group IV |
1.22 ±0.11 ** |
1.12 ±0.10 ** |
Group V |
0.89 ±0.10 * |
0.78 ±0.12 ** |
Group VI |
1.35 ±0.02 ** |
1.23 ±0.10 * |
#Statistical data and details of group I-VI are the same as in Table 1
The various concentrates of D.littoralis on GSH in tissue from normal and paracetamol-induced hepatotoxic rats were depicted in Table 6. The hepatotoxic control group showed a reduction of GSH in liver 0.65 ± 0.08 and kidney as 0.52 ± 0.04. Oral administration of PE concentrates showed considerable GSH in liver 0.72 ± 0.06 and kidney as 0.64 ± 0.06 in group III rats. Oral administration of ethyl acetate concentrates showed a marked reduction in GSH in liver 1.22 ± 0.11 and kidney as 1.12 ± 0.10. Oral administration of methanol concentrates showed reduced the level of GSH in liver 0.89 ± 0.10 and kidney as 0.78 ± 0.12 in group V rats. The administration of EA concentrates of D.littoralis and silymarin treated rats were significantly elevated the level of GSH in the liver and kidney as compared to PE and methanol concentrates.
In the present study shown that a lethal dose of various concentrates of D.littoralis were showed the safety of concentrates. Administration of various concentrates of D.littoralis in rats did not change any autonomic or behavioral reaction. There was no mortality of various concentrates of D.littoralis was recorded at 2000mg/kg. Therefore we have calculated and selected for 200 mg/kg b.wt. D.littoralis concentrates was taken for further investigation.
In addition, paracetamol-induced liver injure due to increased lipid peroxidation, as indicated by the major increase in TBARS. Increased TBARS level in paracetamol-treated rats indicates the major responsibility of lipid peroxidation in the initiation of oxidative stress. Excessive ROS generation triggers the process of lipid peroxidation in cell membranes and destroys cell components and cell death. (Hasanein & Sharifi, 2017) reported that hepatic lipid peroxidation increases through paracetamol toxicity. In the present study, D.littoralis administered rats found that the reduced formation of TBARS in paracetamol-induced rats and thereby protected the liver tissue through antioxidant capacity.
The antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, CAT, and GPx are the most important defense systems against O2− and H2O2 mediated damage (Birben, Sahiner, Sackesen, Erzurum, & Kalayci, 2012). The levels of first-line antioxidant enzymes were significantly exhausted in paracetamol-induced rats. This lacking functioning of free radical-scavenging enzymes leads to the gathering of highly reactive free radicals and resulting in deteriorating alterations (Madkour & Daim, 2013). However, pretreatment with D.littoralis and silymarin significantly elevated antioxidant enzymes SOD, CAT, and GPx in paracetamol-induced rats. Glutathione (GSH) is a major antioxidant against oxidative stress (Fernández-Checa, Hirano, Tsukamoto, & Kaplowitz, 1993). GSH also assists as a scavenger to toxic electrophiles such as NAPQI (Guo et al., 2019). A significant decrease in the GSH level in paracetamol-induced rats suggests that the elevated levels of NAPQI may covalently bind to cell protein, leading to cell necrosis. The cellular GSH depletion is also closely related to the lipid peroxidation and disturbance of intracellular Ca2+ induced by toxic agents (Fu et al., 2018). In the present study, the treatment of Dyschoriste littoralis clearly enhanced GSH levels and enabled the rapid and efficient depletion of ROS production in paracetamol-induced rats, which may be involved in the counteraction of free-radical species.
Conclusions
The current study showed that EA concentrates of D.littoralis against paracetamol-induced hepatic tissue damage by reducing the activities of TBARS and increase the activities of antioxidant enzymes. From our results, ethyl acetate concentrates of D.littoralis had a better antioxidant effect compared to that of two concentrates in paracetamol-induced in rats.