Cloud point extraction for separation, preconcentration and determination zinc (ii) in different pharmaceutical samples


Ministry of Education, School of Gifted Students in Najaf, Iraq, 009647826502522

Abstract

Joining solvent extraction with cloud point extraction methods obtained a susceptible method for separation, pre-concentration, extraction and categorization of Zn (II), after forming an ion-pair association complex between Zn+2 and 4-(3-methyl phenyl azo)-4,5- diphenyl imidazole (MPADPI) with wavelength for maximum absorbance λmax.=496 Nm. This study shows optimum conditions for the formation and exaction ion-pair association complex under pH=9 and 0.5 mL Tritonx-100, 1×10-4 M (MPADPI) and heating at 80 Co for 20 minutes so that this study involved the effect of electrolyte and interferences along with the spectrophotometric determination of Zinc (II) in diverse samples.

Keywords

cloud point, solvent extraction, Zn (II), Azo derivatives, pharmaceutical chemistry

Introduction

As the sensitive and accurate process of cloud point extraction CPE for separation, pre-concentration and determination, many metal cations after converting their ions to suitable species can be extracted into cloud point layer, CPL intended for numerous industrialized, environmental, medical and medicinal uses. The extraction and categorization of Fe(II) in dissimilar samples has testified using safranin in HCl medium in order to create ion-pair association complex with wavelength for maximum absorbance λmax.=530 Nm. It included determination all of the optimum conditions and studied the effect of some parameter with thermodynamic study and spectrophotometric determination of Fe(II) in diverse samples (Shawket & Mustafa, 2018).

Onium system joined with CPE process for separation and determination of Co (II), the supreme absorbance was at wavelength λmax.=294 Nm with optimum conditions 0.8 M HCl, 0.5 mL Triton X-100, and heating the solution at 85 Co for 15 minutes (Hayder & Jawad, 2017). Triton X-114 used in many studies for separation and extraction of different metal cations in different species by solvent extraction (Blanchet-Chouinard & Larivière, 2018; Chen & Teo, 2001; Ghasemi & Kaykhaii, 2016; Jawad & Husien, 2018; Majedi, Kelly, & Lee, 2014; Vatankhah, Ebrahimi, & Saberi, 2018; Zhang, Yang, Liu, & Yang, 2017). As sensitive method extraction and determined Zn (II) in diverse tasters after pinpoints all optimal conditions of the extraction method to get highly extraction efficiency several studies about separation, extraction and determination of different metal cations (Abed, 2015; Barache et al., 2018; Jalbani & Soylak, 2015; Jawad & Husien, 2018; Ren, Zhao, Sun, & Zhong, 2013; Yang, Jia, Yang, Li, & Liao, 2017; Şatıroğlu & Arpa, 2008).

In the present work, 4-(3-methyl phenyl azo)-4,5- diphenyl imidazole (MPADPI) was used to determine Zn (II) by CPE and preconcentration after complexation with Zn (II), ions. The method was utilizing the complexation of Zn (II), with MPADPI in the existence of Triton X-100 (non-ionic surfactant). Optimal investigational conditions were examined relating to a standard solution of the identical medium, with the intention of exploring the probability to attain the highest extraction efficiency with minimal sample treatment and minimum tentative conditions. This stands for a substitute technique for the investigation of metal ions in many samples based on their environmental importance.

Materials and Methods

Experimental

Spectrophotometric and absorbances measurements are based on Biochrom double beam spectrophotometer (Biochromlibra 560) (A Harvard Bioscience company Cambridge UK), electrostatic water bath (Hambory 90, England). All chemical are employed as received from Authorized companies with further purification so that used deionized water is used for preparing all solutions by using a suitable volumetric flask.

Comprehensive method

Aqueous solution 10mL in volume contains optimum quantities of Zn2+ ion at optimum pH, TritronX-100 volume, while 1x10-4M of 4-[3-methylphenyl azo]-4,5-diphenyle imidazole (MPADPI) was heated in an electrostatic water bath at optimum temperature and time of heating until the formation of CPL. Subsequently, separate the CPL and dissolve in 5mL ethanol, and measure the absorbance of the alcoholic solution at extracted mas of ion-pair association complex. Accordingly, treat the aqueous phase according to Dithizon spectrophotometric method and return to calibration curve as inFigure 1 and calculate the remainder and transfer quantity of Zn+2 ion to compute Distribution ratio (D).

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/cc27d40f-2f38-4c5a-8c29-c8cba35a1a96/image/b4d402dd-d9dc-4fcc-b0d3-6b3d4394eb7d-upicture1.png
Figure 1: Calibration curve for determining Zinc(II) ion in aqueous solutions

D = [ Z n 2 + ] c p l Z n 2 + ] a q

Results and Discussion

Spectrophotometric study of ion-pair association complex extracted into CPL shows the wavelength for the highest absorbance of the complex with ( mas= 496nm) as in Figure 2.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/cc27d40f-2f38-4c5a-8c29-c8cba35a1a96/image/5c1251a9-998f-4ebd-95ad-e92a97e684d2-upicture2.png
Figure 2: Absorption bands in UV-Vis region for ion-pair association complex of Zn2+ ion. A/ the organic reagent, B/the ion-pair complex extracted.

Variation of pH value

10mL aqueous solution contains 50 µg of Zn2+ ion at different pH values, in presence 1x10-4 MADPI and 0.5 mL of Triton X-100. Heat the solution in an electrostatic water bath at a suitable temperature for the exact time until forming CPL. Then, separate CPL from aqueous solution and complete the experiment as in comprehensive method to compute distribution ratio D. The results were as inFigure 4; Figure 3.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/cc27d40f-2f38-4c5a-8c29-c8cba35a1a96/image/2d41d6b5-6b09-4d82-a834-70fb34bde497-upicture3.png
Figure 3: Influence of pH on the formation and stability of the extracted ion-pair complex

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/cc27d40f-2f38-4c5a-8c29-c8cba35a1a96/image/4959e46d-d98a-4f90-a182-1e6a4a76ea08-upicture4.png
Figure 4: Effect of pH on the extraction efficiency of Zn+2 and D values

The outcomes explain that pH of 9 has the finest value of an acidic function with the higher extraction efficiency of Zn2+ for the reason that this pH value gives higher concentration and stability of the ion-pair complex formed. Any pH value less than the optimal value affects to decline extraction efficiency because of the decrease in binding of MPADPI with Zn2+ ion so that pH value higher than optimum decline extraction efficiency also.

Variation of metal ion concentration

Aqueous solution 10mL in volume contains the intensifying amount of Zn2+ ion at pH=9 in existence 0.5 ml of Triton-100, and 1x10-4 of MPADPI treated these solutions consistent with the adopted comprehensive method. The resultant curves were as in Figure 6; Figure 5.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/cc27d40f-2f38-4c5a-8c29-c8cba35a1a96/image/80e8e2a9-0991-4b7c-bde2-d3d4daf8b6b5-upicture5.png
Figure 5: Effect of Zn+2 ion concentration on formation and stability of ion-pair extraction complex

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/cc27d40f-2f38-4c5a-8c29-c8cba35a1a96/image/53b1da67-751b-40da-925c-8911b2d67884-upicture6.png
Figure 6: Effect of Zn+2 ion concentration on the extraction efficiency of Zn +2 and D values

The consequences explain that 60 µgZn2+/10mL as been the best concentration necessary for thermodynamic equilibrium to form ion-pair association complex with higher concentration and stability. Any focus is lower than optimal value inadequate to reach proper thermodynamic equilibrium, so that metal ion Zn2+ concentration of higher than optimal value influences to drop extraction efficiency according to mass action law.

Effect of Tritonx-100 Volume

Sequences of aqueous solutions 10mL in volume have been employed with 60µg of Zn2+ ion at pH=9 in existence of different volumes of Tritonx-100 and 1x10-4M MPADPI. These solutions have heated in an electrostatic water bath at a suitable temperature and time. The task has completed based on the comprehensive method. The corresponding results have been depicted in Figure 8; Figure 7.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/cc27d40f-2f38-4c5a-8c29-c8cba35a1a96/image/f4286bda-46e1-47fc-9840-98c4a4160d7a-upicture7.png
Figure 7: Influence of Tritonx-100 volume on formation CPL with high properties

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/cc27d40f-2f38-4c5a-8c29-c8cba35a1a96/image/9e2f134b-1798-47a4-a4b3-d7c38105166b-upicture8.png
Figure 8: Influence of Tritonx-100volume on extraction efficiency of Zn2+ ion

The results explained that 0.5mL of Tritonx-100 was the best volume, which achieves our status of critical micelles concentration (CMC) to form the best CPL with minor volume and greater density to extract a higher concentration of ion-pair association complex of Zn2+ ion. Any volume higher than the finest value influences upturn diffusion of micelles in aqueous solution and lessen properties of CPL and extraction efficiency.

Effect of temperature

A sequence of aqueous solutions 10mL in volume has employed with 60µg of Zn2+ at pH=9 in presence 0.5mL of Tritonx-100 and 1x10-4M (MPADPI). These solutions are heated in an electrostatic water bath, but at different temperature for a suitable time until forming CPL and complete the experiment as in the comprehensive method, the consequences were as in Figure 10; Figure 9.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/cc27d40f-2f38-4c5a-8c29-c8cba35a1a96/image/6cb42378-f05a-4764-b59f-7ac7c02d7f93-upicture9.png
Figure 9: Effect of temperature on formation CPL

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/cc27d40f-2f38-4c5a-8c29-c8cba35a1a96/image/427b2b3a-a2f0-47f3-a645-d8f2f5389f9b-upicture10.png
Figure 10: Influence of temperature on extraction efficiency of Zn2+ ion

Afterwards, calculate extraction constant Kex at different temperatures by applying the relation below. The fallouts are depicted inFigure 11.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/cc27d40f-2f38-4c5a-8c29-c8cba35a1a96/image/45c67848-d4e8-456b-901a-660f5bb7d28d-upicture11.png
Figure 11: Influence of Temperature on extraction constant values

From the slope of the straight-line relation in Figure 9 and the thermodynamic relation below, the results are clarified in Table 1.

Table 1: Thermodynamic data for extraction constant of Zn2+

∆Hex

∆Gex

∆Sex

0.143 KJ.mol-1

-64.106 KJ.mol-1

182.008 J.mol-1K-1

log k e x 1 / T = s l o p e = - H e x 2 . 303 R
G e x = - R   T   ln   K e x
G e x = H e x - T S e x

The optimum temperature for higher extraction efficiency was 80°C, at this temperature formed best cloud point layer (CPL) with food properties for extraction higher concentration of ion-pair association complex of Zn2+ ion.

Effect of heating time

A sequence of an aqueous solution of 10mL in volume with 60µg Zn2+ at pH=9 has employed in the existence of 0.5mL Tritonx-100 and 1x10-4M (MPDPI). Heat these solutions in an electrostatic water bath at 80 C° for a different time until forming CPL. Then, separate CPL from aqueous solution and dissolve in 5ml ethanol. Afterwards, measure the absorbance of the alcoholic solution at λmax 496nm vis blank prepared at the identical routine in the absence of Zn2+ ion and treat the aqueous solution according to Dithizone spectrophotometric technique (Vatankhah et al., 2018) as in comprehensive method. The outcomes were as inFigure 13; Figure 12.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/cc27d40f-2f38-4c5a-8c29-c8cba35a1a96/image/9bbb8dda-79a5-49ca-b7a1-d4613f624b70-upicture12.png
Figure 12: Influence of heating time on formation CPL

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/cc27d40f-2f38-4c5a-8c29-c8cba35a1a96/image/b6091542-4ce2-48d7-b05a-5decfa27ad85-upicture13.png
Figure 13: Influence of heating time on extraction efficiency of Zn+2 ion

The results have shown that 20 minutes was the optimal heating time necessary to form CPL with the highest features to reach higher extraction efficiency, this time allows us to reach thermodynamic equilibrium for creating the best CPL. Any heating time greater than optimal effect to increase diffusion micelles of TritonX-100 and drop aggregation of micelles and decrease dehydration that is mean decrease in extraction efficiency.

Effect of electrolyte

Aqueous solutions of 10mL in volume have used with 60µg of Zn+2 ion at pH= 9 in presence 0.5mL Tritonx-100, 1x10-4M MPDPI and 0.1M of different electrolytes. Heat these solutions in an electrostatic water bath at 80°C for 20 minutes up to the formation of CPL. Then, separate CPL from aqueous solution, dissolve in 5mL ethanol and record the absorbance of alcoholic solutions at גmas of 469nm in contradiction of blank organised by the identical manner without Zn2+ ion. The aqueous solutions have treated as in comprehensive method to compute D-values, and the results have been detailed inTable 2.

Table 2: Influence of Electrolyte on the extraction efficiency of Zn2+ ion

Electrolytes

Abs. 469nm

D

LiCl

1.24

54.56

NaCl

0.985

42.87

KCl

0.956

83.19

NH4Cl

0.921

28.22

MgCl2

1.08

46.55

CaCl2

0.972

40.58

AlCl3

0.944

31.43

The results have depicted an enhancement in extraction efficiency in the existence of electrolyte in aqueous solution since electrolyte has an effect to lessen dielectric constant and polarity of an aqueous solution, and terminate the hydration shell of Zn2+ ion. Namely, there is an increase in binding of metal ion Zn2+ with MPDPI to increase ion-pair association complex extracted into CPL. According, there is a dissimilar effect with diverse electrolytes due to the different behaviour of electrolytes in aqueous solution.

Influence of interferences

A series of aqueous solutions 10mL in volume contain 60Mg of Zn2+ ion at pH=9 in existence 0.5mL Tritonx-100, 0.1M NaCl, 1x10-4M MPDPI, complete the work as in the comprehensive method, the results were as in Table 3.

Table 3: Influence of interferences on the extraction efficiency of Zn2+ ion

Interferences

Abs. 496nm

D

Cd2+

0.543

23.40

Ni2+

0.616

28.16

Co2+

0.667

31.54

Hg2+

0.533

18.46

Cu2+

0.481

13.66

Table 4: Statistical treatments for the calibration graphs

Analytical parameters

Value

Molar absorptivity (L.mol-1.cm-1)

10696.168

RSD%

0.135%

Sandell’s Sensitivity (µg/cm2)

0.00596

Detection limit (µg/mL)

0.0041

Table 5: Quantities of Zn(II) in different samples

Samples

ppm Zn(II)

Celery

55

Leeks

54

Metal

46

Beef

42

Chicken meat

45

Fish

38

The results have demonstrated the presence of these foreign metal cations in aqueous solution effect decrease extraction efficiency of Zn2+ ion, for the reason that these metal ions participate Zn2+ ion to form ion-pair association complex and this behaviour motivate consumption of some reagent MPDPIs that are in effect to increase the rate of dissociation direction in thermodynamic equilibrium and lessen ion-pair association complex of Zn2+ ion extracted to CPL. Hence, these metal cations have different behaviours in aqueous solution to exhibit diverse effect as interferences.

Stoichiometry

With the intention of getting the most feasible structure of ion-pair association complex of Zn2+ ion with MPDPI. Based on followed mole ratio and method, the results have shown in Figure 15; Figure 14.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/cc27d40f-2f38-4c5a-8c29-c8cba35a1a96/image/c7a112af-fa9f-4eef-b49a-53cfd358ba4a-upicture14.png
Figure 14: Mole ratio method

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/cc27d40f-2f38-4c5a-8c29-c8cba35a1a96/image/2dc1fd3a-d936-46ca-81ea-d3317a8864b6-upicture15.png
Figure 15: Continuous variation method(job method). Ion-pair association complex

The results show the most likely structure of the ion-pair association complex was 1:1 (metal ion: MPDPI).

Spectrophotometric determination of Zn(II)

To determine Zn (II) in different samples, the calibration graph for Zn(II) was obtained by the procedure described previously in which a series of standard solutions were analyzed in triplicates to test the linearity. And all of the samples were prepared according to the previous scientific sources (Admasu, Reddy, & Mekonnen, 2016; Bahar & Babamiri, 2014; Reddy, Kumar, Ramachandraiah, Thriveni, & Reddy, 2007). The results and statistical treatments for the calibration graphs were as in Figure 16,Table 4 and Table 5.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/cc27d40f-2f38-4c5a-8c29-c8cba35a1a96/image/56d53a1c-ff03-472f-89fa-555bdbd92a01-upicture16.png
Figure 16: Calibration curve for spectrophotometric determination of Zn(II)

Conclusion

The paper presents a simple, very sensitive and cost-effective cloud point extraction coupled with a spectrophotometric technique to evaluate Zn (II) ion that can be useful for biological and pharmaceutical samples. Also, it clarifies that a cloud point extraction is an investigative tool that has unlimited capacity to be investigated in the enhancing detection limits and other analytical features over of the spectrophotometric analytical methods. It is a useful option for preconcentration and separation processes owing to its flexible recoveries and concentration factors.