Introduction

Hand hygiene or cleaning hands using soap and water, antiseptic hand wash, antiseptic hand rub(alcohol-based hand sanitiser) are the surgical based antisepsis. By cleaning hands reduces the spread of deadly germs to patients. Reduce the risk of health care providers from infection caused by germs acquired from patients. Various hand washing techniques are present, followed by healthcare providers. Most healthcare-associated infections(HAI) transmitted by the hand of health care providers(HCPs) direct contact when the hands of heads HCPs transfer microorganisms between individuals or between individual and environmental reservoirs (Ekwere & Okafor, 2013). The hand hygiene liaison committee defines nine controlled research that indicates significant reductions in infection-related outputs in hospitalized patients, even in settings with a high disease incidence (Mathur, 2011). The World health organisation (WHO) gave the ‘My five moments for hand washing’ to minimise problems related to hand washing. These five moments that call for the use of hand washing include the movement before touching the patient, before performing aseptic and clean procedures, after being at risk of exposure to body fluids, after touching a patient and after touching the patient surrounding (Jemal, 2018).

The previous articles focus on various hand washing practices among the health care providers performing hand hygiene activities within the health institutions by health care providers with alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) multiple times causes discomfort. The right technique for the duration of hand washing using soap and water and ABHR are very important to confirm the removal of microorganisms (Engdaw, Gebrehiwot, & Andualem, 2019). Previous authors conducted various survey-based studies on the hand washing technique among health care providers. They have given the elaborate explanation for the techniques used by the health care providers in hand hygiene. Handwashing using chemical disinfection of hands accepted as a universal precautionary measure in preventing and limiting the speed of Healthcare-Associated infections (Joshi, 2013).

Previous research on various aspects like nanotechnology (Ke, 2019; Wu, 2019), phytochemistry (Chen, 2019; Li, 2020), pharmacology (Rengasamy, 2016; Shukri, 2016), cancer technology which includes hepatic carcinoma (Jainu, Priya, & Mohan, 2018), laryngeal cancer (Wang, 2019), oral cancer (Ramya, Priya, & Gayathri, 2018; Rengasamy, Venkataraman, & Veeraraghavan, 2018), and thyroid cancer (Ma, 2019) etc., herbal medicine (Menon, Priya, & Gayathri, 2016), biotechnology (Mohan, Veeraraghavan, & Jainu, 2015) as well as biochemical and molecular toxicology (Gan, Zhang, & Zhou, 2019; Ponnulakshmi, Shyamaladevi, Vijayalakshmi, & Selvaraj, 2019) were conducted by our team. These epidemiological studies stemmed out for the benefit of our community. The aim of the present study is to find out whether the health care providers are knowledgeable about hand washing technique and awareness of the healthcare-associated diseases and discuss the various hand washing techniques.

Materials and Methods

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among the healthcare providers Of age group to analyse their knowledge and awareness on hand washing technique. Approval was obtained from the institutional review board, Saveetha Dental College. The survey was conducted among 202 health care providers. Simple random sampling was done. Self-administered questionnaires of 14 close-ended questions were prepared and distributed among the health care providers through online survey website google forms. The responses were collected and tabulated in an Excel sheet and analysed, the results were represented in a bar chart. Statistical analysis was done in SPSS software. Chi-Square test was used to analyse and compare the knowledge of the healthcare providers on hand hygiene techniques.

Results and Discussion

The survey included health care providers from varied age groups and sex. From the people participating in the survey, 67.33% were males and 32.67% were females. When the health care providers were asked about whether they followed the hand hygiene practice, 65.35% responded yes and 34.65% responded no [Figure 1]. When the health care providers were asked about why hand hygiene practices were important 17.82% responded as for preventing diseases, 39.11% responded as personal hygiene and 43.07% responded both are preventing diseases and personal hygiene [Figure 2]. 57.92% of the healthcare providers were aware of the materials used in hand washing techniques [Figure 3]. 67.33% wash their hands before and after eating, whereas 32.67% wash before eating only [Figure 4]. 59.90% examined their patients with Gloves, whereas 40.10% responded as they examined the patient at times with Gloves but usually bare handed [Figure 5]. 50.99% were aware of the correct technique suggested by the world health organisation for hand washing, 23.76% were not aware about it and 19.31% responded that they had never heard about it and 5.94% responded not much aware about it [Figure 6]. When the health care providers were asked whether they were aware about the steps involved in hand washing techniques, 58.91% responded that they were aware [Figure 7]. 58.42% of the healthcare providers were trained for the hand washing techniques [Figure 8]. 60.89% responded As hand

hygiene practice was an essential part for patient care [Figure 9]. 14.36% responded wearing jewels, 44.06% responded damaged skin, 32.18% responded artificial fingernails and 9.41% responded regular use of hand cream when they were asked about the following steps avoided when associated with the increased livelihood of colonization of hands with harmful agents or germs [Figure 10]. 18.81% don’t wash their hands, 43.07% washed for 5 to 10 seconds and 38.12% washed for more than 20 seconds after examining the patients [Figure 11]. Hand washing with antiseptic soap or alcohol hand rub was recommended by 63.37% of healthcare providers [Figure 12]. When the healthcare providers were asked about their method of wiping hands after hand washing, 37.13% responded with a single-use towel/ tissue,29.21% responded with a lab coat, 27.72% used their clothes and the remaining 5.94% swinged them in the air [Figure 13]. The chi-square test was done comparing the gender and the awareness of the healthcare providers on hand hygiene practices where a total of 80 males and 52 females were aware about it [Figure 14]. The chi-square test was done comparing gender and how health care providers examine their patients. Where a total of 73 males and 46 females wear gloves while examining [Figure 15]. The chi-square test was done comparing the gender and awareness of the steps involved in hand washing techniques. Where a total of 67 males and 52 females were aware about it [Figure 16]. The chi-square test was done comparing the gender and healthcare providers awareness as hand hygiene practice is an essential part of patient care. Where a total of 70 males and 53 females were aware about it [Figure 17]. The chi-square test was done comparing the gender and the duration of hand wash by the healthcare providers. Where the majority 73 males wash for 5-10 secs and majority 32 females, wash for more than 20 secs [Figure 18]. The chi-square test was done comparing the gender and method of wiping hands after hand wash by the healthcare providers. Where the majority 46 males of all use their clothes and majority 35 females of all, use a single-use towel/tissue [Figure 19].

In the present study, moderate level correct response and significantly positive correlation were observed among the health care providers. The knowledge and awareness towards hand washing technique and hand hygiene practice showed compliance among healthcare providers. As the awareness systems progressed, healthcare providers were introduced to more hand hygiene procedures. The results were collected and the data analyzed where the moderate level of the health care providers had awareness on hand washing technique. More knowledge and awareness should be incorporated in the primary level and efficiently, a positive report will be observed.

In the present study, 37.13% used single-use towel/tissue and 27.72% used their clothes itself. The similar finding had been found in the study conducted by (Ekwere et al., 2013) where 29.5% used common towels and the remaining 8.6% used their handkerchief and 15.8% used air dry. When the people were asked about the duration of hand wash, In the present study, 43.07% washed hands for 5 to 10 seconds. The similar finding had been recorded in the article by (Jemal, 2018) where 58% responded yes and 22% respondent no for 5 to 10 seconds. When the healthcare providers were asked about their justification for not practicing hand hygiene, In the present study 34.65% wore gloves, 40.10% responded that it’s not important in every patient And 25.25% responded that their colleagues don’t practise hand hygiene. The similar finding had been recorded in the previous article by (Engdaw et al., 2019) where 53.10% wore their gloves, 86.6% responded that it’s not important in every patient and 89% others responded that their colleagues don’t practise hand hygiene.

The limitation of the present study was that it included only 202 health care providers and it was not done on a varied population with various age groups. Less sample size was the major limitation of the study. In future, an extensive study with large sample size and varied population would analyse the awareness and knowledge of healthcare providers on hand washing technique and hand hygiene.

Conclusion

The present study concluded that the knowledge and awareness on hand washing technique and hand hygiene practices among the health care providers are slightly moderate. The Pearson chi-square analysis showed that males are more aware than females on the hand hygiene practices among healthcare providers. For further argumentation, awareness should be created at the primary level in the initial years of practice of the healthcare providers.