New Method for the Estimation and Validation of Fostemsavir and Ganciclovir by using RP-HPLC


Department of Chemistry, Sri Satya Sai University of Technology and Medical Sciences, Sehore-466001, Madhya Pradesh, India, 7659827321

Abstract

We have evolved a completely unique, reliable HPLC technique for simultaneous quantification of Fostemsavir and Ganciclovir. The chromatographic detachment was attained on an X-Bridge phenyl column (150x4.6mm, 3.5 µ) using isocratic elution with a buffer containing 0.1% OPA and acetonitrile proportion of 50:50 as movable part with a stream of 1 mL/min at room temperature. The maximum absorbance of the drugs was observed at 236 nm. Dissolve 1mL of orthophosphoric acid in 1 lt of HPLC marked water and sieved by using 0.45 µ filter paper, this solution was used as a buffer. 10 min run time was used to separate Fostemsavir and Ganciclovir. Analysis was achieved within 15 min over honest linearity within the concentration range from 6-90 µg/mL of Fostemsavir and 2.5-37.5 µg/mL of Ganciclovir. To check the system suitability parameters, the normal solution was injected six times, from the outcomes, it was concluded that all the outcomes were well under the acceptable range. Precision and recovery study results were well under a suitable range. From this technique, an assay of Fostemsavir and Ganciclovir was performed and the results were well under the acceptable range. Degradation studies were carried out on Fostemsavir and Ganciclovir, with a purity threshold greater than the purity angle in all conditions and within the acceptable range. The above-mentioned technique was validated according to ICH guidelines.

Keywords

HPLC, Fostemsavir, Ganciclovir, Development, Validation

Introduction

Ganciclovir, marketed under the brand name Cytovene, among others, is an antiviral (Hayden & Jong, 2011; Pillay & Zambon, 1998) drug used to treat cytomegalovirus (Martí-Carreras & Maes, 2019; Mattes, Mclaughlin, Emery, Clark, & Griffiths, 2000) (CMV) infections. Ganciclovir is generally associated with a variety of serious drugs. Common drug reactions (≥ 1% of patients) include granulocytopenia (Breedveld, Kormelink, Egmond, & Jong, 2017), neutropenia (Donadieu, Beaupain, Fenneteau, & Bellanné-Chantelot, 2017), anaemia (Stein, Connor, Virgin, Ong, & Pereyra, 2016), thrombocytopenia (Ahmed, Majeed, & Powell, 2007), fever, nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia (Duncanson, Talley, Walker, & Burrows, 2018), diarrhoea, abdominal pain, flatulence (Bailey, Carter, & Neher, 2009), anorexia (Espie & Eisler, 2015), increased liver enzymes, headache, confusion, hallucination (Chaudhury, Kumar, & Soren, 2009), seizures (Greenhalgh, Weston, Dundar, Nevitt, & Marson, 2020), pain and phlebitis (Nisio, Peinemann, Porreca, Rutjes, & W, 2015) at the injection site (due to high pH), sweating, rash, itching, increased levels of serum creatinine (McDonald, Drescher, Weber, & Tracy, 2012) and blood urea.

Fostemsavir, marketed with a trade name of Rukobia. It is an antiretroviral (Cohen et al., 2016) medication for adults living with HIV/AIDS who have tried multiple HIV medications (Savarino & Shytaj, 2015) and whose HIV infection cannot be effectively treated with other therapies due to resistance, aversion or safety considerations. Nausea is the most common adverse reaction. Significant adverse reactions included rises in liver enzymes among participants already infected with the hepatitis B or C virus and changes in the immune system (immune reconstitution syndrome) (Krueger & Majde, 2003). Fostemsavir is an inhibitor of HIV and a prodrug of temsavir (BMS-626529). Fostemsavir is a type 1 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) gp120-directed attachment inhibitor. Figure 1 shows the chemical structures of Fostemsavir and Ganciclovir.

Experiment

Chemicals and Reagents

Acetonitrile, Orthophosphoric acid and water (HPLC mark) took from Merck (Mumbai, India). The APIs (Fostemsavir and Ganciclovir) took from Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Hyderabad.

Equipment

An HPLC system (Waters alliance e2695 model) consisting of a quaternary pump, PDA detector-2998 was used. Data processing was performed with Empower 2.0 software.

Chromatographic Conditions

The chromatographic detachment was achieved in isocratic mode at room temperature using an X-bridge phenyl column (150x4.6 mm, 3.5 µ). A mixture of acetonitrile and 0.1 percent orthophosphoric acid (OPA) in 50:50 v/v at a stream of 1 mL/min was used as a movable phase. The total time of 10 min was used to separate the selected drugs Fostemsavir and Ganciclovir.

Preparation of Buffer

1 mL of OPA is dissolved in 1 liter water (HPLC mark) and filtered by using 0.45 µ filter paper.

Diluent

Movable part was used as diluent.

Standard Preparation

Carefully weigh and transfer 60 mg of Fostemsavir and 25 mg of Ganciclovir in a volumetric flask of capacity 100 mL and add app. 70 mL of diluents, sonicated to melt it for 30 min. and add diluents up to mark. 5 ml of the above prepared stock solution was taken and diluted to 50 mL with diluents.

Sample Preparation

Carefully weigh and transfer weight similar to 60 mg of Fostemsavir tablet powder and 25 mg of Ganciclovir capsule powder in a flask of 100 mL and add 70 mL of diluent. Sonicated to melt and dilute up to the mark with diluent. 5 mL of the above prepared stock solution was taken and diluted to 50 mL with diluents.

Results and Discussion

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/a769a8fb-83de-4001-983a-5864163180e1/image/288972be-9a27-457b-9228-597762bb3ef4-upicture1.png
Figure 1: Structural representations of (A) Fostemsavir and (B) Ganciclovir

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/a769a8fb-83de-4001-983a-5864163180e1/image/af335d74-ce27-4288-8905-b858f4f424cb-upicture2.png
Figure 2: Chromatogram of system suitability

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/a769a8fb-83de-4001-983a-5864163180e1/image/899b8699-569d-41ee-ba96-2f1f84969e1b-upicture3.png
Figure 3: Chromatogram of blank

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/a769a8fb-83de-4001-983a-5864163180e1/image/6d2ac6ba-e0a5-4b1c-be1a-13fbc873d589-upicture4.png
Figure 4: Calibration plots of(A) Fostemsavir and (B) Ganciclovir

Table 1: Optimized Chromatographic Conditions

Parameter

Proposed Method

Column

X-Bridge phenyl (150x4.6 mm, 3.5 µ)

Mobile Phase

0.1% Ortho phosphoric acid: Acetonitrile (50:50)

Injection capacity

10 µl

Stream

1.0 mL/min

Temperature of column

25°C

Absorbance

236 nm

Run Time

10.0 min

Elution time of Fostemsavir

6.932 min

Elution time of Ganciclovir

3.152 min

Table 2: Results of System Suitability

Parameter

Fostemsavir

Ganciclovir

Theoretical plates

6261

3395

USP Tailing

1.02

1.01

USP Resolution

15.14

-

Elution time

6.932

3.152

Table 3: Outcomes of Linearity

S. No

Fostemsavir

Ganciclovir

Concentration (µg/mL)

Area

Concentration (µg/mL)

Area

1

6.00

358697

2.50

164921

2

15.00

915146

6.25

435210

3

30.00

1585421

12.50

865142

4

60.00

3452174

25.00

1754821

5

75.00

4265201

31.25

2150364

6

90.00

5104273

37.50

2581637

Table 4: Outcomes of Method Precision

S. No.

Region of Fostemsavir

Region of Ganciclovir

1

3452187

1745289

2

3452610

1725104

3

3415827

1798658

4

3432506

1748562

5

3455852

1752379

6

3462516

1732605

Average

3445250

1750433

Std. dev

17555.234

25763.520

% RSD

0.51

1.47

Table 5: Results of Intermediate Precision

S.No.

Area of Fostemsavir

RSD

Region of Ganciclovir

RSD

1

3451271

1725936

2

3456238

1765234

3

3422562

0.63

1732569

1.25

4

3425174

1785642

5

3465923

1745216

6

3475824

1748575

Table 6: Results of Accuracy

Accuracy

Amount of Fostemsavir

% Recovery

Amount of Ganciclovir

% Recovery

50*

30

99.8

12.5

98.9

100*

60

99.6

25

99.4

150*

90

99.9

37.5

99.7

* Results are mean recovery of three sample preparations

Table 7: Outcomes of robustness

Variable

% RSD of Fostemsavir

% RSD of Ganciclovir

Stream (0.8 mL/min)

0.48

0.54

Stream(1.2 mL/min)

0.35

0.72

Org part (45:55)

0.79

0.28

Org part (55:45)

0.26

0.61

Table 8: Outcomes of forced degradation

Stress Parameter

% of Degradation

Fostemsavir

Ganciclovir

Acid deg (1N HCl)

11.6

13.9

Alkali deg (1N NaOH)

11.9

13.1

Peroxide degradation (30% Peroxide)

13.4

12.5

Reduction degradation (30% sodium bi sulphate)

12.2

12.1

Thermal (sample, 70°C, 6 Hrs)

10.8

11.2

The current study was planned to develop an easy, accurate and fast systematic HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of Fostemsavir and Ganciclovir. The chromatographic conditions have been optimised to provide good assay efficiency. Various combinations of Fostemsavir and Ganciclovir have been tried to optimise the mobile process. The final mobile step of the activity is orthophosphoric acid (0.1 per cent) and acetonitrile (50:50 v/v). The mobile step of each drug was selected on the basis of its polarity. A wavelength of 236 nm was chosen because the two drugs showed strong absorption at this 236 nm wavelength. The rate of flow was 1.0 mL/min. Fostemsavir and Ganciclovir peaks were eluted at 3.152 min, 6.932 min, respectively. The proposed approach is checked by all analyses within limits set out in the ICH guidelines. 10 min run time was used to separate Fostemsavir and Ganciclovir peaks. The optimised chromatography conditions are shown in Table 1.

System Suitability

The normal solution has been introduced into the HPLC system and the system suitability parameters are within the range. Table 2 shows the effects of the device suitability and Figure 2 shows the typical chromatogram.

Specificity

From the specificity, it was concluded that no blank interference was observed at the retention times of Fostemsavir, Ganciclovir. Figure 3 is a null chromatogram.

Linearity

The linearity concentration of Fostemsavir was prepared in the concentration range of 6-90 µg/ml. The regression equation was estimated to be Y= 56757.94x + 2245.96 and the correlation coefficient (R2) was 0.9995.

The linearity concentration of Ganciclovir was prepared in the concentration range of 1-15 µg/ml. The regression equation was estimated to be Y= 69075.53x + 1201.30 and the correlation coefficient (R2) was 0.9999. Linearity results were shown in Table 3, calibration plots of Fostemsavir and Ganciclovir were shown in Figure 4.

Precision

The accuracy of this method has been tested for intraday and intermediate precision variations. Six separate injections of the test solution of Fostemsavir and Ganciclovir was analyzed on the same day under the same experimental conditions were used to test intraday studies. Six separate injections of the test solution of Fostemsavir and Ganciclovir was analyzed on different days, different analyst and different instruments were used to test intermediate precision. Since percentage RSD values were found to be <2%, the method is highly accurate. A good recovery of the drug was gained at individual concentrations, suggesting that the procedure was successful. Outcomes of the precision were given in Table 4.

Intermediate Precision (Ruggedness)

In Table 5, intermediate precision results were given.

Accuracy

The accuracy of the system was achieved by measuring the recovery experiments at three stages (50 percent, 100 percent and 150 percent ). APIs were prepared at concentrations of 30, 60, 90 μg/mL of Fostemsavir and 12,5, 25, 37,5 μg/mL of Ganciclovir. For each spike stage, the test solution was injected three times and the test was performed according to the test process. The recovery percentage, mean and RSD values were determined. The percentage recovery values were found to be in the range of 98-102 percent. Accuracy findings have been shown in Table 6.

Robustness

In robustness, there is a minor variation in the flow rate (±0.2 ml) and the organic solvent (±10 percent) in their chromatographic state and there is no substantial improvement in the percent RSD. The robustness findings have been shown in Table 7.

Degradation Behavior

Fostemsavir and Ganciclovir samples were exposed to different conditions of forced degradation in order to include partial degradation of the compound. Forced degradation studies have been conducted to demonstrate the method is acceptable for deteriorated goods. In addition, the studies provide details on the conditions under which the drug is unstable such that steps can be taken during formulation to prevent possible instability. The outcomes of forced degradation have been shown in Table 8.

Conclusions

Degradation activity of the drug was studied under hydrolysis (acid, baseline, and neutral) oxidation, photolysis and thermal stress conditions. The drug was best capable under simple, neutral conditions and unstable under oxidative conditions. An isocratic RP-HPLC method for the determination of fostemsavir and Ganciclovir has been and is accurate and is effective. The regression line equation is capable of predicting the drug concentration in the range of 6-90µg/ml of fostemsavir and 1-15µg/ml ganciclovir, respectively, from the peak area obtained. The method has been successfully validated and has allowed accurate, sensitive, robust and precise detection of fostemsavir and Ganciclovir in a popular marketed preparation.